Abstract

We set out to investigate the role of additive uncertainty under behaviourally plausible non‐standard central bank loss functions on future inflation. Building on a substantial body of evidence in the economic psychology literature, we propose (i) period‐by‐period loss functions that are non‐convex, i.e. displaying diminishing or non‐increasing sensitivity to losses, and (ii) non‐linear weighting of probabilities, hence departing from the expected utility paradigm. The main conclusion of the study is that if the additive uncertainty is caused by a non‐normal distributed additive shock, for instance if the probability distribution of the shock is skewed, then with these departures from the quadratic function the principle of certainty equivalence does not hold anymore.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.