Abstract
As service user involvement, particularly through ‘expert patient’ schemes, increases for service development and implementation in the UK, we investigated the concordance between how patients with personality disorder view their interpersonal functioning and the views of staff who care for them in a high security mental health setting. We compared self and observer ratings of interpersonal functioning for 55 legally-defined psychopathic disorder patients detained in a high security psychiatric hospital using the CIRCLE, an instrument designed to assess interpersonal functioning. We found that male patients underestimated their worst qualities, such as dominance (p < .0005) or coerciveness (p < .0005), and overestimated their best qualities, such as nurturance (p < .0005), a finding not intuitively surprising but which confirms aspects of previous research. This result raises the questions of how such discordance should be interpreted, whether self or observer ratings should be considered more valid, and whether such findings have a bearing on both future risk assessment and the individual's eventual movement from high secure care.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.