Abstract
Normally, the function of poetry or rhetoric, according to writers on poetics and literary criticism, is to represent good things as good and bad things as bad. However, already in ancient Greece poets and orators delighted in perversely describing good or beautiful things as bad or ugly, and vice versa . The same is found in Arabic literature, where this ability was sometimes called the hallmark of excellence in a poet. Going against received opinion ( paradoxos ), which has been termed taghāyur in Arabic, is a favourite practice of several writers and poets, including al-Jāh&05B4;iz&05B4; and Ibn al-Rūmī. Another term for this phenomenon is tah&05B4;sīn al-qabīh&05B4; wa-taqbīh&05B4; al-h&05B4;asan , which is also the title of one of al-Tha ‘ālibī’s many anthologies, here discussed in more detail. In some cases the ‘paradox’ is put to subversive purposes; more commonly, it serves to show the poet's skill or wit.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
