Abstract

Few would argue that science is better done in silos, with no transparency or sharing of methods and resources. Yet scientists and scientific stakeholders (e.g., academic institutions, funding agencies, journals) alike continue to find themselves at a relative impasse in the implementation of open science practices, slowing advancement and inadvertently perpetuating ongoing crises surrounding reproducibility. The present commentary draws attention to critical gaps in the current scientific ecosystem that perpetuate closed science practices and divide the community on how to best move forward. It also challenges scientists as individuals to improve the quality of their science by incorporating open practices in their everyday work, and provides a starter list of steps that any researcher can take to be the change they seek.

Highlights

  • Few would argue that science is better done in silos, with no transparency or sharing of methods and resources

  • Open science advocates cite crises in reproducibility, transparency, and rigor that they say can only be addressed through open sharing of materials, methods, data, results, and software

  • The debate regarding open science is prominent in the brain imaging community for reasons that, at a high level, may mirror polarizing factors across all of science

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Few would argue that science is better done in silos, with no transparency or sharing of methods and resources. Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research, New York, NY, USA Full list of author information is available at the end of the article efforts commonly go uncited and unrewarded by institutions and funding agencies, and they continue to raise questions about the value of shared data.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.