Abstract

Protein chemical shifts are routinely used to augment molecular mechanics force fields in protein structure simulations, with weights of the chemical shift restraints determined empirically. These weights, however, might not be an optimal descriptor of a given protein structure and predictive model, and a bias is introduced which might result in incorrect structures. In the inferential structure determination framework, both the unknown structure and the disagreement between experimental and back-calculated data are formulated as a joint probability distribution, thus utilizing the full information content of the data. Here, we present the formulation of such a probability distribution where the error in chemical shift prediction is described by either a Gaussian or Cauchy distribution. The methodology is demonstrated and compared to a set of empirically weighted potentials through Markov chain Monte Carlo simulations of three small proteins (ENHD, Protein G and the SMN Tudor Domain) using the PROFASI force field and the chemical shift predictor CamShift. Using a clustering-criterion for identifying the best structure, together with the addition of a solvent exposure scoring term, the simulations suggests that sampling both the structure and the uncertainties in chemical shift prediction leads more accurate structures compared to conventional methods using empirical determined weights. The Cauchy distribution, using either sampled uncertainties or predetermined weights, did, however, result in overall better convergence to the native fold, suggesting that both types of distribution might be useful in different aspects of the protein structure prediction.

Highlights

  • Protein structures can today routinely be simulated by methods such as molecular dynamics or Monte Carlo simulations, using molecular mechanics force fields (Shaw et al, 2010; Karplus & McCammon, 2002; Snow et al, 2002)

  • Chemical shift predictions were performed with an implementation of CamShift (Kohlhoff et al, 2009) and the physical energy was approximated using the computational efficient PROFASI force field (Irback & Mohanty, 2006)

  • We present a probabilistic method for biasing protein structure simulations with experimentally measured chemical shifts, based on the inferential structure determination formalism (ISD) (Rieping, Habeck & Nilges, 2005)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Protein structures can today routinely be simulated by methods such as molecular dynamics or Monte Carlo simulations, using molecular mechanics force fields (Shaw et al, 2010; Karplus & McCammon, 2002; Snow et al, 2002). This is not always a feasible method to determine a protein structure by itself. To elucidate the native protein structure efficiently, the force field energy can be augmented by restraints obtained from experiments. An optimal structure in this approach could be determined for example by minimizing the hybrid energy function

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.