Abstract
Several professional groups, which are not health professionals, are more likely to witness situations requiring basic life support (BLS) due to the nature of their job. The aim of this study was to assess BLS learning after 150 min of training in undergraduate students of sports science and their retention after eight months. Participants trained on BLS (150-min session: 30 theory, 120 practice). After training (T1) and after 8 months (T2), we evaluated their performance of the BLS sequence and two minutes of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). At T1, the 23 participants presented a mean score of 72.5 ± 21.0% in the quality of the CPRs (compressions: 78.6 ± 25.9%, ventilation: 69.9 ± 30.1%). More than 90% of the participants acted correctly in each step of the BLS sequence. At T2, although the overall quality of the CPR performed did not decrease, significant decreases were observed for: correct hand position (T1: 98.2 ± 8.8, T2: 77.2 ± 39.7%), compression depth (T1: 51.4 ± 7.9, T2: 56.0 ± 5.7 mm), and compression rate. They worsened opening the airway and checking for breathing. In conclusions, participants learned BLS and good-quality CPR after the 150-min training session. At eight months they had good retention of the BLS sequence and CPR skills. Training on airway management and the position of the hands during CPR should be reinforced.
Highlights
A person with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) does not always receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) [1] presumably due to a lack of competence of the bystanders witnessing the emergency [2]
The objectives of this study were to: (1) describe the learning of the basic life support (BLS) sequence and the quality of the CPR performed after 150 min of training in undergraduate students of sports science, and (2) analyse the retention of the BLS sequence and CPR
After the 150-min BLS training, our participants showed good CPR skills when attending to an OHCA in a simulated sports scenario
Summary
A person with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) does not always receive cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) [1] presumably due to a lack of competence of the bystanders witnessing the emergency [2]. Public Health 2019, 16, 4771; doi:10.3390/ijerph16234771 www.mdpi.com/journal/ijerph
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.