Barriers to Improving Pain Management in the Emergency Department: Lessons from a Lean-Driven Quality Improvement Initiative

Review question/objective The objectives of the review are to determine the best available evidence on strategies to improve pain management and factors affecting pain management in emergency departments. More specifically, the review questions are to identify: What are the best strategies to improve pain management in emergency departments? What are the factors improving pain management in emergency departments? What are the factors hindering pain management in emergency departments? Background Pain is the most common reason for seeking medical attention in the emergency department.1,2 Although it accounts for up to 78% of visits to the emergency department3,4, management of pain has not received sufficient attention from many emergency department team members.5 Unfortunately, pain may be viewed as consequence of illness and injury that must be tolerated or even in some instances as a punishment for inappropriate behavior.6 Oligoanalgesia refers to the under treatment of pain and in the emergency department is thought to be common; despite the expectation that pain relief is considered to be the emergency department top priority.2, 7-10 A study conducted by Fosnocht and colleagues revealed only 45 % of the emergency department patients received pain medication prescriptions and 70% of those who received medication reported decreased pain that met with their needs.8 Despite the fact that intravenous opioid is the drug of choice recommended for treatment of severe pain, 11 less than one third of patients with severe pain were given the medication in one study.5 Up to 74% of patients who presented at an emergency department were discharged while they were suffering from moderate to severe pain.2,7 Unrelieved pain is a major, yet avoidable, significant health problem.12 Optimal management of pain in emergency department is challenging. Untreated and undertreated pain can have serious physiological and psychological consequences. Unrelieved acute pain stimulates sympathetic activity which can cause tachycardia, hypertension and sweating.6 It may exacerbate myocardial ischemia by increased myocardial work and oxygen consumption, may impair immune function by activation of the metabolic stress response, and can cause reduction in cognitive function.6,13 In addition, untreated and undertreated pain can aggravate the patients’ discomfort and exacerbate an already-stressful situation in the emergency department.5 Pain management is truly an essential nursing and medical responsibility. In application of the ethical principles of beneficence (duty to benefit another) and non-malfeasance (duty to do no harm), health personnel have a role and obligation in providing effective pain management and comfort to all patients. Hospitals are required to inform the patients regarding their rights related to pain management as stated in the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospital Organization 2001 Guideline.6,12 Timely and appropriate pain management is an important quality indicator of emergency department performance.14 Meeting the patients’ needs for pain relief certainly influences their satisfaction with emergency department care. Efforts to improve patients’ pain management in all health care settings are supported by the collaboration between the American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN), the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA) and the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and the American Pain Society (APS). Over 25 years of research on pain management conducted in the United States of America, Canada, and Australia, multiple standards/guidelines on pain management and regulatory statutes on pain management have been developed.2 Despite significant efforts to enhance pain management, oligoanalgesia in emergency departments still remains an important problem for emergency professions.2 After the release of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) standards for pain management for accredited health care organizations, pain assessment and management practices in the emergency departments showed some improvements over time.15 This notion was reflected in the study by Herr and Titler.15 Medical records from hospitalised older adult patients with hip fractures admitted through the emergency department of 12 acute care hospitals (N = 1454) were reviewed. Records were categorised into 3 different periods between 2000 and 2002. Pain assessment practices and pharmacological pain treatment practices derived from an Evidence-based Guideline on Acute Pain Management in Older Adults were reviewed. Results from this study revealed improvements in pain assessment practices over time (99% of patients had pain documentation in 2002). However, up to 34% of patients in this study had no objective assessment of pain (numeric rating scale) documented. Moreover, the mean pain intensity reported remained high (6.8 to 7.2 out of 10) across the 3 time periods. By the end of the study (2002) only 60% of patients had any analgesic ordered and of these 59% had an opioid ordered. Oligoanalgesia still needs to be explored in order to be able to manage pain in a more timely and more appropriate manner. A number of studies have been conducted to elucidate factors affecting pain management in emergency departments.10,16-18 Yet, such information is still inconclusive. Berben and colleagues suggested possible barriers in current pain management in the emergency department could arise from workload, attitudes of staff, knowledge deficits and misconceptions on the need of effective pain management.10 A cross-sectional analysis of documented emergency department visits by elderly patients from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey16 suggested a potential influence of attitudes toward analgesic prescribing, and the recognition of ethnic, racial, and age differences in patients with pain on the effective pain management in the emergency department. Additionally, patients' clinical condition instability may affect the pain management of the injured patients who often experience considerable pain in the emergency department.17 Lack of communication between the patient and healthcare professional, as well as organisational limitations have also been associated with pain management.18 Despite these concerns, strategies to enhance pain management have long been developed in response to the awareness of inadequate emergency department pain management.19-24 Those strategies reported in the literature include, but are not limited to, innovative use of guidelines 22, 25, use of pain protocol 26, nurse-initiated pain management 18, 21, and staff educational interventions.24 Nevertheless, we have not reached agreement on the best strategy to enhance pain management. Improving inadequate pain control is a critical goal in emergency health care. As patients’ primary health care advocators, emergency health personnel play a vital role in resolving under-treated pain in their patients.27 Up till now, the literature shows an unresolved issue of under optimal pain management in the emergency departments, which deserves serious consideration. The Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Library of Systematic Reviews and CINAHL databases have been searched and no previous systematic reviews on this specific topic were identified as being published or underway. It is anticipated that this systematic review will uncover literature encompassing factors affecting and the strategies to enhance pain management in the emergency department. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise the best available research evidence on factors that influence pain management in the emergency department, with the aim of providing timely and appropriate emergency department pain management in order to fulfil the needs for pain relief of the patients and increase their satisfaction. Inclusion criteria Types of participants This review will consider both qualitative and quantitative publications that include patients, their family members, physicians, or nurses in emergency departments. Types of intervention(s)/phenomena of interest The quantitative component of the review will consider studies that evaluate the strategies to improve pain management and factors affecting pain management in emergency departments. The qualitative component of this review will consider studies that explore the experiences of patients, family members, physicians or nurses in emergency departments regarding the pain management. Types of outcomes Quantitative: The quantitative component of this review will consider studies that include, but not limited to, the following outcome measures: patient satisfaction, relief or reduction of pain, and time to first analgesia. Types of studies The quantitative component of the review will consider any randomised controlled trials, pseudo-randomised controlled trials, before and after studies, observational analytical studies, and descriptive studies such as surveys to enable the identification of current best evidence regarding the strategies to enhance pain management and factors affecting pain management in emergency departments. The qualitative component of the review will consider qualitative studies that draw on the experiences on pain management and factors that affect pain management including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory and ethnography. Search strategy The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies. The search will be limited to English language reports and will be not be limited by year of publication. A three-step search strategy will be utilised in each component of this review. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL will be undertaken followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract, and of the index terms used to describe article. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles will be searched for additional studies. The databases to be searched include: Academic Search Elite CINAHL ProQuest Health and Medical Complete PubMed Science Direct Scopus SpringerLink Wiley InterScience The search for unpublished studies will include: Mednar, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, Dissertations Full Text, and conference proceedings. Initial keywords to be used will be: pain, pain management, strategy, strategies, factors, barriers, emergency, emergency department, emergency room, satisfaction, and pain reduction. Assessment of methodological quality Qualitative papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI) (Appendix I). Quantitative papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) (Appendix II). Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer. Data collection Qualitative data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardised data extraction tool from the JBI-QARI (Appendix III). Quantitative data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardised data extraction tool from JBI-MAStARI (Appendix IV). The data extracted will include specific details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes of significance to the review question and specific objectives. Data synthesis Qualitative research findings will, where possible be pooled using the JBI-QARI. This will involve the aggregation or synthesis of findings to generate a set of statements that represent that aggregation, through assembling the findings (Level 1 findings) rated according to their quality, and categorising these findings on the basis of similarity in meaning (Level 2 findings). These categories are then subjected to a meta-synthesis in order to produce a single comprehensive set of synthesised findings (Level 3 findings) that can be used as a basis for evidence-based practice. Where textual pooling is not possible the findings will be presented in narrative form. Quantitative papers will, where possible be pooled in statistical meta-analysis using the JBI-MAStARI. All results will be subject to double data entry. Odds ratio (for categorical data) and weighted mean differences (for continuous data) and their 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for analysis. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the standard Chi-square. Where statistical pooling is not possible the findings will be presented in narrative form. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest in this review.

Mandatory documentation of pain in the emergency department increases analgesic administration but does not improve patients’ satisfaction of pain management

Introduction: Pain is a very common reason for presenting to the Emergency Department (ED). While the causes for pain are diverse, ranging from fractures and other injuries to chest or abdominal pain or headache, the provision of effective, timely analgesia should be one of the principal goals of emergency staff . Inadequate pain relief and poor treatment in pain management in ED was highlighted by Wilson and Pendleton and they coined the term oligoanalgesia to describe this phenomenon. They found that only 44% of patients with pain received analgesics in the ED, and sub therapeutic dosing was common. Methods: This was a prospective observational study conducted in HGH ED after approval from Department of Emergency Medicine Audit & Ethical Committee, investigators were divided over shifts in ED for 2 weeks. Total of 448 patients were recruited. Inclusion criteria were any patient presented to Ed in acute pain over the last 24 hour, age >18 years old. Patients in life threatening conditions, major trauma, altered mental status or communication difficulties were excluded. Results: Total of 448 patients were recruited. Of which 358 number were males, 90 Number were females. Trauma-related cases composed about 100 number (22.3%) of the pain cases. The number of pain medications prescribed to patients throughout the ED course and upon discharge was recorded. Conclusion: The administration of pain-relieving medications in the ED was associated with significant pain reduction upon disposition. However, pain was still inadequately treated and scoring was not adequately recorded in patient files. Need for proper structured approach for pain management in HGH ED is warranted.

Review question/objective The objectives of the review are to determine the best available evidence on strategies to improve pain management and factors affecting pain management in emergency departments. More specifically, the review questions are to identify: What are the best strategies to improve pain management in emergency departments? What are the factors improving pain management in emergency departments? What are the factors hindering pain management in emergency departments? Background Pain is the most common reason for seeking medical attention in the emergency department.1,2 Although it accounts for up to 78% of visits to the emergency department3,4, management of pain has not received sufficient attention from many emergency department team members.5 Unfortunately, pain may be viewed as consequence of illness and injury that must be tolerated or even in some instances as a punishment for inappropriate behavior.6 Oligoanalgesia refers to the under treatment of pain and in the emergency department is thought to be common; despite the expectation that pain relief is considered to be the emergency department top priority.2, 7-10 A study conducted by Fosnocht and colleagues revealed only 45 % of the emergency department patients received pain medication prescriptions and 70% of those who received medication reported decreased pain that met with their needs.8 Despite the fact that intravenous opioid is the drug of choice recommended for treatment of severe pain, 11 less than one third of patients with severe pain were given the medication in one study.5 Up to 74% of patients who presented at an emergency department were discharged while they were suffering from moderate to severe pain.2,7 Unrelieved pain is a major, yet avoidable, significant health problem.12 Optimal management of pain in emergency department is challenging. Untreated and undertreated pain can have serious physiological and psychological consequences. Unrelieved acute pain stimulates sympathetic activity which can cause tachycardia, hypertension and sweating.6 It may exacerbate myocardial ischemia by increased myocardial work and oxygen consumption, may impair immune function by activation of the metabolic stress response, and can cause reduction in cognitive function.6,13 In addition, untreated and undertreated pain can aggravate the patients’ discomfort and exacerbate an already-stressful situation in the emergency department.5 Pain management is truly an essential nursing and medical responsibility. In application of the ethical principles of beneficence (duty to benefit another) and non-malfeasance (duty to do no harm), health personnel have a role and obligation in providing effective pain management and comfort to all patients. Hospitals are required to inform the patients regarding their rights related to pain management as stated in the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Hospital Organization 2001 Guideline.6,12 Timely and appropriate pain management is an important quality indicator of emergency department performance.14 Meeting the patients’ needs for pain relief certainly influences their satisfaction with emergency department care. Efforts to improve patients’ pain management in all health care settings are supported by the collaboration between the American Society for Pain Management Nursing (ASPMN), the Emergency Nurses Association (ENA) and the American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) and the American Pain Society (APS). Over 25 years of research on pain management conducted in the United States of America, Canada, and Australia, multiple standards/guidelines on pain management and regulatory statutes on pain management have been developed.2 Despite significant efforts to enhance pain management, oligoanalgesia in emergency departments still remains an important problem for emergency professions.2 After the release of the Joint Commission on Accreditation of Healthcare Organizations (JCAHO) standards for pain management for accredited health care organizations, pain assessment and management practices in the emergency departments showed some improvements over time.15 This notion was reflected in the study by Herr and Titler.15 Medical records from hospitalised older adult patients with hip fractures admitted through the emergency department of 12 acute care hospitals (N = 1454) were reviewed. Records were categorised into 3 different periods between 2000 and 2002. Pain assessment practices and pharmacological pain treatment practices derived from an Evidence-based Guideline on Acute Pain Management in Older Adults were reviewed. Results from this study revealed improvements in pain assessment practices over time (99% of patients had pain documentation in 2002). However, up to 34% of patients in this study had no objective assessment of pain (numeric rating scale) documented. Moreover, the mean pain intensity reported remained high (6.8 to 7.2 out of 10) across the 3 time periods. By the end of the study (2002) only 60% of patients had any analgesic ordered and of these 59% had an opioid ordered. Oligoanalgesia still needs to be explored in order to be able to manage pain in a more timely and more appropriate manner. A number of studies have been conducted to elucidate factors affecting pain management in emergency departments.10,16-18 Yet, such information is still inconclusive. Berben and colleagues suggested possible barriers in current pain management in the emergency department could arise from workload, attitudes of staff, knowledge deficits and misconceptions on the need of effective pain management.10 A cross-sectional analysis of documented emergency department visits by elderly patients from the National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Survey16 suggested a potential influence of attitudes toward analgesic prescribing, and the recognition of ethnic, racial, and age differences in patients with pain on the effective pain management in the emergency department. Additionally, patients' clinical condition instability may affect the pain management of the injured patients who often experience considerable pain in the emergency department.17 Lack of communication between the patient and healthcare professional, as well as organisational limitations have also been associated with pain management.18 Despite these concerns, strategies to enhance pain management have long been developed in response to the awareness of inadequate emergency department pain management.19-24 Those strategies reported in the literature include, but are not limited to, innovative use of guidelines 22, 25, use of pain protocol 26, nurse-initiated pain management 18, 21, and staff educational interventions.24 Nevertheless, we have not reached agreement on the best strategy to enhance pain management. Improving inadequate pain control is a critical goal in emergency health care. As patients’ primary health care advocators, emergency health personnel play a vital role in resolving under-treated pain in their patients.27 Up till now, the literature shows an unresolved issue of under optimal pain management in the emergency departments, which deserves serious consideration. The Cochrane Library of Systematic Reviews, Joanna Briggs Institute (JBI) Library of Systematic Reviews and CINAHL databases have been searched and no previous systematic reviews on this specific topic were identified as being published or underway. It is anticipated that this systematic review will uncover literature encompassing factors affecting and the strategies to enhance pain management in the emergency department. The aim of this systematic review is to synthesise the best available research evidence on factors that influence pain management in the emergency department, with the aim of providing timely and appropriate emergency department pain management in order to fulfil the needs for pain relief of the patients and increase their satisfaction. Inclusion criteria Types of participants This review will consider both qualitative and quantitative publications that include patients, their family members, physicians, or nurses in emergency departments. Types of intervention(s)/phenomena of interest The quantitative component of the review will consider studies that evaluate the strategies to improve pain management and factors affecting pain management in emergency departments. The qualitative component of this review will consider studies that explore the experiences of patients, family members, physicians or nurses in emergency departments regarding the pain management. Types of outcomes Quantitative: The quantitative component of this review will consider studies that include, but not limited to, the following outcome measures: patient satisfaction, relief or reduction of pain, and time to first analgesia. Types of studies The quantitative component of the review will consider any randomised controlled trials, pseudo-randomised controlled trials, before and after studies, observational analytical studies, and descriptive studies such as surveys to enable the identification of current best evidence regarding the strategies to enhance pain management and factors affecting pain management in emergency departments. The qualitative component of the review will consider qualitative studies that draw on the experiences on pain management and factors that affect pain management including, but not limited to, designs such as phenomenology, grounded theory and ethnography. Search strategy The search strategy aims to find both published and unpublished studies. The search will be limited to English language reports and will be not be limited by year of publication. A three-step search strategy will be utilised in each component of this review. An initial limited search of MEDLINE and CINAHL will be undertaken followed by analysis of the text words contained in the title and abstract, and of the index terms used to describe article. A second search using all identified keywords and index terms will then be undertaken across all included databases. Thirdly, the reference list of all identified reports and articles will be searched for additional studies. The databases to be searched include: Academic Search Elite CINAHL ProQuest Health and Medical Complete PubMed Science Direct Scopus SpringerLink Wiley InterScience The search for unpublished studies will include: Mednar, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses, Dissertations Full Text, and conference proceedings. Initial keywords to be used will be: pain, pain management, strategy, strategies, factors, barriers, emergency, emergency department, emergency room, satisfaction, and pain reduction. Assessment of methodological quality Qualitative papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Qualitative Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-QARI) (Appendix I). Quantitative papers selected for retrieval will be assessed by two independent reviewers for methodological validity prior to inclusion in the review using standardised critical appraisal instruments from the Joanna Briggs Institute Meta Analysis of Statistics Assessment and Review Instrument (JBI-MAStARI) (Appendix II). Any disagreements that arise between the reviewers will be resolved through discussion, or with a third reviewer. Data collection Qualitative data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardised data extraction tool from the JBI-QARI (Appendix III). Quantitative data will be extracted from papers included in the review using the standardised data extraction tool from JBI-MAStARI (Appendix IV). The data extracted will include specific details about the interventions, populations, study methods and outcomes of significance to the review question and specific objectives. Data synthesis Qualitative research findings will, where possible be pooled using the JBI-QARI. This will involve the aggregation or synthesis of findings to generate a set of statements that represent that aggregation, through assembling the findings (Level 1 findings) rated according to their quality, and categorising these findings on the basis of similarity in meaning (Level 2 findings). These categories are then subjected to a meta-synthesis in order to produce a single comprehensive set of synthesised findings (Level 3 findings) that can be used as a basis for evidence-based practice. Where textual pooling is not possible the findings will be presented in narrative form. Quantitative papers will, where possible be pooled in statistical meta-analysis using the JBI-MAStARI. All results will be subject to double data entry. Odds ratio (for categorical data) and weighted mean differences (for continuous data) and their 95% confidence intervals will be calculated for analysis. Heterogeneity will be assessed using the standard Chi-square. Where statistical pooling is not possible the findings will be presented in narrative form. Conflicts of interest There are no conflicts of interest in this review.

An inadequate pain management is common in the emergency department. Our objective was to analyze pain management among children with an orofacial infection or trauma in the emergency department and to assess compliance and satisfaction with analgesia prescribed at discharge. Cross-sectional, observational and analytical study in children attending the emergency department for an orofacial infection or trauma over 2 months. Pain management in the emergency department, analgesia prescribed at home and, following a call to parents, treatment provided and its adequacy to control pain were registered. In total, 252patients (mean age: 4.5 years, SD: 3.89) were included. Pain assessment was recorded at the triage for 8.7%, and in the medical report, for 3.6%. Analgesia was administered to 41.3% in the emergency room. At discharge, no analgesia was prescribed to 13.9%; scheduled analgesia, to 25.4%; and as needed, to 60.3%. Pediatricians prescribed scheduled analgesia more frequently than surgeons (34.4% versus 16.5%, p < 0.01). At home, no analgesia was administered to 39.3%; scheduled analgesia, to 36.1%; and as needed, to 23%. There is little correlation between prescription at discharge and at home (Kappa: 0.178). Analgesia was considered adequate in 84% of cases, and was more frequent in trauma injuries than in infections (85.7% versus 14.3%, p < 0.01). Pain assessment and management was scarce in the emergency department. The most common prescription was as needed, contrary to what is recommended in the guidelines. Analgesic control worked better for trauma injuries than for infections.

BackgroundPain is one of the main reasons for emergency department visits and pain management is one of the most important components of patient care.1 The emergency department (ED) is a...

Pain is the most common reason for admission to the Emergency Department (ED) in patients with sickle cell disease (SCD). It can be associated with severe complications and impairs quality of life. Pain management in the ED should be well-defined and aggressive. The objective of this study was to evaluate pain management in the pediatric ED of a country recently facing SCD and to identify priority areas of intervention. The charts of SCD children who had accessed the ED from January 2003 to December 2010 were retrospectively reviewed. Pain management was compared before and after 2008. During 2008, educational events on SCD-pain management involved the ED personnel. Twenty-three/28 patients (82%) accessed the ED for/with pain, of a total of 96/185 accesses for/with pain. Mean age was 5.9 years (range, 8 mo to 17.9 y). Fifty-four percent of the episodes resulted in hospital admissions, with a mean length of stay of 6.2 days. Pain was scored in 30% of the episodes; analgesics were administered in 50%. After the educational interventions, high score at triage was assigned more frequently (72% vs. 40%), waiting time for analgesics administration reduced (64 vs. 87 min), and use of Visual Analogue Scale increased (50% vs. 8%). Pain represents the main reason for admission to the ED in children with SCD even in countries recently facing SCD. Educational interventions obtained significant but still limited improvement in pain management. The diffusion of national guidelines with defined pain evaluation and treatment protocols represents a priority to further ameliorate care of SCD children.

Despite pain being a crucial aspect of urgent-emergency care, the attention of healthcare workers towards this symptom in the Emergency Department (ED) is still inadequate. The aims of this study were to assess children's and their adults accompanier's satisfaction regarding pain management in Italian ED, considering healthcare workers' attention to the symptom as well as the appropriateness and efficacy of treatments received. Questionnaires were administered face-to-face by trained interviewers over the period of one weekend in 29 Italian ED. The questionnaires were addressed to children 3-16 years old, assigned a green code at triage, and their adult accompaniers. Overall, 1581 questionnaires were administered (923 to parents or caregivers, 658 to children). The reported level of attention to pain by the care team was high (57.20%) as was the adults' satisfaction with the pain management (95.01%); a high level of satisfaction was related to the healthcare workers' attention to pain. According to the adults, 73.56% of the healthcare professionals collected accurate information about pain; this was confirmed by the children. Pain was managed by a doctor-and-nurse team in less than half the cases (43.77%). Therapy efficacy was reportedly poor: only 14.01% of children were pain-free when leaving the ED. Despite increasing understanding of pain and the availability of guidelines and effective analgesics, efficient pain relief in paediatric patients in the ED remains an unfulfilled goal: half of children with pain did not receive any treatments. Therefore the quality of pain management in the ED needs to be improved.

Effective pain management in Emergency Departments (EDs) is vital for improving patient comfort and clinical outcomes. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of current pain management practices in ED settings, focusing on the challenges and opportunities for optimization. The review examines pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic pain management strategies, evaluating their effectiveness and identifying inconsistencies and gaps in current practices. Key challenges in the ED environment include time constraints, variability in clinical protocols, and the need to address diverse patient needs, including those of paediatric, geriatric, and chronic pain patients. The review highlights the importance of standardized pain assessment tools and protocols to improve consistency in pain management. Innovations, such as technological advances and multimodal approaches, are explored for their potential to enhance pain management practices. Recommendations address identified challenges, including improved training for ED staff, the development of evidence-based protocols, and the integration of multimodal pain management strategies. By addressing these areas, the review aims to contribute to the development of more effective and uniform pain management practices in emergency care, ultimately leading to better patient outcomes and experiences. This review emphasizes the need for ongoing research and adaptation of best practices to meet the evolving needs of patients in emergency settings.

Emergency nurses perceived barriers to effective pain management at emergency department in Amhara region referral hospitals, Northwest Ethiopia, 2021. Multi-center cross sectional study

Aim—(1) To describe a process approach to the improvement of pain management in emergency departments. (2) To compare analgesia ordering and administration practices for patients with acute fractures before and...

Pain management in adults during long-bone fracture reduction in the Gaza Strip: a clinical audit

A multicenter randomized control trial evaluating professional practice assessment of patient pain management after simulation training course: Study protocol

Adequate knowledge and positive attitude among nurses are essential for successful pain management as a fundamental aspect of patients' rights. This study aimed to assess the knowledge, attitude and perceived barriers of nurses regarding acute pain management in emergency department. In this cross-sectional study, participating nurses were selected using a consecutive sampling technique within a medical university. Data were collected using 4 questionnaires, which consisted of demographic information checklist, Pain Management Principles Assessment Tool (PMPAT), Nurses' Attitude Survey (NAS), and Nurses' practice checklist. The correlation between knowledge, attitude, and barriers with each other and with baseline characteristics of participates were studied. 400 nurses with the mean age of 38.26±10.39 years were studied (63% male). The average knowledge score of studied nurses was 7.38 ± 2.16 (range: 1 -14). All 400 (100%) nurses exhibited a low level of knowledge. The mean attitude score of participants was 58.47± 22.08 (range:26-100). 214 (53.5%) cases had low attitude, 44 (11.0 %) average attitude, and 142 (35.5%) cases exhibited a high attitude score. The mean score of barriers about pain management was 36.48 ± 23.52 (range: 0 - 80). 23 (5.8%) participants answered the perceived barriers as never, 113 (28.3%) as seldom, 71 (17.8%) as sometimes, 133 (33.3%) as often, and 60 (15.0%) as routine. There was an reverse relationship between the knowledge score and perceived barriers of pain management (r=-0.164, p<0.001). No significant relationship was found between the average knowledge score and nurses' attitudes (r = 0.092; p > 0.065). The findings of this study highlight the need for ongoing training and the organization of workshops for nurses due to their low levels of knowledge and attitude. These training sessions should focus on the concept of pain, assessment methods, pain relief, as well as pharmacology and the physiology of pain.

BackgroundIntravenous lidocaine has shown promise as an effective analgesic in various clinical settings, but its utility for pain management in emergency departments, especially for bone fractures, remains relatively understudied.ObjectiveThis study compared intravenous lidocaine to pethidine for femoral bone fracture pain management.MethodsThis double-blind, randomized, controlled clinical trial was conducted in the emergency department of AJA University of Medical Sciences affiliated hospitals. Patients aged 18–70 years-old with femoral bone fracture and experiencing severe pain, defined as a numerical rating scale (NRS) of pain ≥ 7, were included in the study. One group received intravenous pethidine (25 mg), while the other group received intravenous lidocaine (3 mg/kg, not exceeding 200 mg), infused with 250 ml saline over 20 min. Pain levels were evaluated before treatment administration (0 min) and at 10, 20, 30, 40, 50, and 60 min after treatment administration using the NRS.ResultsSeventy-two patients were enrolled in the study. Demographic characteristics and pain scores were similar between the two groups. The mean pain scores upon arrival for the lidocaine and pethidine groups were 8.50 ± 1 and 8.0 ± 1, respectively; after one hour, they were 4.0 ± 1 and 4.0 ± 1, respectively. While there was a statistically significant reduction in pain in both groups after one hour, there were no clinically or statistically significant differences between the two groups (p = 0.262). Pethidine had a higher incidence of adverse events, though not statistically significant. Additionally, females required more rescue analgesics.ConclusionThe administration of intravenous lidocaine is beneficial for managing pain in femoral bone fractures, suggesting that lidocaine could be a potent alternative to opioids.Trial RegistrationIRCT20231213060355N1 (https://irct.behdasht.gov.ir/trial/74624) (30/12/2023).