Barriers and bridges for sustainable forest management: the role of landscape history in Swedish Bergslagen.
Abstract The first part of this chapter explores the Pan-European context for sustainable forest management (SFM) policy, and how this translates into regional and local contexts. Next, the chapter introduces Bergslagen in southern Sweden and reviews its forest landscape history of over the past 2000 years. Then, summarizes the present barriers resulting from this long forest landscape history for different dimensions of the sustainability of landscapes as social-ecological systems. Further, the chapter examines how local and regional actors and stakeholders in Bergslagen support the implementation of Pan-European, European Union (EU) and Swedish policies directed towards the different dimensions of sustainable forest management. Finally, the chapter discusses the development of integrated landscape approaches as a bridge for policy implementation in terms of place- and evidence-based collaborative learning within and among European forest and woodland landscapes as social-ecological systems with different histories.
- Research Article
88
- 10.1007/s10980-019-00864-1
- Jul 1, 2019
- Landscape Ecology
ContextAchieving sustainable development as an inclusive societal process, and securing sustainability and resilience of human societies as well as the natural environment are wicked problems. Realising sustainable forest management (SFM) policy in local landscapes is one example.ObjectivesUsing the European Union as a case study for the implementation of SFM policy across multiple governance levels in different contexts, we discuss the benefits of adopting an integrated landscape approach with place and space, partnership and sustainability as three pillars.MethodsWe map the institutional frameworks for implementing SFM policy within all EU member states. Next, we analyse whether or not there is EU-level forest governance, and how power is distributed among EU, member state and operational levels.ResultsMechanisms to steer a centralized forest governance approach towards SFM in the EU are marginal. Instead, there is a polycentric forest governance with 90 national and sub-national governments, which create and implement own and EU-wide SFM-related policies. Additionally, both among and within regional governance units there is a large variation in governance arrangements linked to land ownership at the operational level.ConclusionsTo effectively translate EU-wide SFM and SFM-related policies into action in local landscapes, it is crucial to acknowledge that there are different land ownership structures, landscape histories and alternative value chains based on multiple ecosystem services. Therefore regionally adapted landscape approaches engaging multiple stakeholders and actors through evidence-based landscape governance and stewardship towards sustainable forest landscape management are needed. Model Forest, Long-Term Socio-Ecological Research platform and Biosphere Reserve are three of many examples.
- Book Chapter
6
- 10.1007/978-3-642-12725-0_23
- Jan 1, 2013
To implement sustainable forest management (SFM) policies in actual landscapes, policy actors and managers exercising governance, and different forest stakeholders need to be provided with empirical information of how different SFM dimensions are understood and develop locally. Focusing on the state and trends of SFM implementation in the Ukrainian Carpathians we analyze the barriers and bridges at multiple levels from the national to the local management unit. First, we review the national Ukrainian policies relevant for forest and woodland landscapes, and describe how the involved stakeholders implement policies top–down. Using the Skole district in the Carpathian Mountains as a case study, we then describe the status of SFM dimensions, and evaluate the implementation process bottom–up. Interviews and analyses of official statistics show that three types of gaps need to be bridged: (1) a policy creation gap between the local level situation and ecological, economic and socio–cultural needs at the national and regional levels; (2) a policy implementation gap between the official definition of SFM, and how its different criteria and objectives are understood by forest stakeholders; (3) a knowledge gap between the need of a holistic transdisciplinary approach for SFM implementation, and the present sectoral approach to governance of forest landscapes and disciplinary research. Ways of bridging these gaps are capacity building, introducing arenas for collaboration, and applying a zoning approach at multiple scales to satisfy economic, ecological and socio–cultural dimension of SFM.KeywordsForest ManagementForest ResourceForest PolicySustainable Forest ManagementCarpathian MountainThese keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
- Research Article
43
- 10.1016/j.forpol.2019.01.005
- Feb 8, 2019
- Forest Policy and Economics
Implementing sustainable forest management (SFM) policy on the ground is not straightforward, and depends on the social-ecological context. To meet the need for place-based stakeholder collaboration towards regionally adapted knowledge production and learning in support of SFM an integrated landscape approach can assist. Hosting most of the circumboreal forest Russia is a key global player. To transition boreal forestry in the Russian Federation from wood mining towards SFM after the collapse of USSR several initiatives were initiated. Our aim is to review the outcomes and consequences of the initiatives employing the international Model Forest concepts' six principles in Russia. To identify candidates for the study we identified 12 local initiatives using this term, all in Russia's boreal forest biome. However, while seven demonstration forests focused on improving wood production practices, five were long-term stakeholder-driven development processes aimed at SFM, and were approved members of the International Model Forest Network. The five latter were selected for a detailed study to understand their temporal dynamic in the circumboreal Model Forest context, and the extent to which they complied with the six principles of the Model Forest concept as an example of a landscape approach. The sources, amounts and durations of these initiatives' funding affected both outcomes and consequences on the ground. All five had developed a partnership that formally shared a commitment to SFM. However, not all areas were large enough to represent all dimensions of SFM. Not all Model Forests developed a representative, participative, transparent, and accountable governance structure, which affected the programs of their activities. Finally, knowledge-sharing, capacity-building and networking at multiple levels was variable. In spite of Russia hosting most of the circumboreal forest the Model Forest concept was not sustained in Russia due to ending of foreign project funding, to limited continuity of committed local capacity, and poor support from national-level decision makers. The exception is the Komi Model Forest's transition to a successful consulting company focusing on SFM. To develop regionally adapted approaches to implement SFM policy we stress the importance of sharing experiences from Model Forests as well as other landscape approach concepts among countries and regions with different landscape histories and governance arrangements. To enhance this, we propose a general analytic framework for learning through evaluation about place-based long-term initiatives that integrate evidence-based knowledge about states and trends of sustainability and cross-sector multi-level governance.
- Research Article
69
- 10.1093/forestry/cpr048
- Oct 7, 2011
- Forestry
Summary While sustainable forest management (SFM) policy processes are well developed, implementation on the ground remains a challenge. Given the diversity of biophysical conditions, economic histories and governance systems on the European continent, regionally and temporally adapted and adaptive solutions are needed for both social and ecological systems. To illustrate this, we apply (1) a biographic forest and woodland history approach to central Sweden’s Bergslagen region, where boreal sustained yield forestry was widely applied first and (2) a comparative case study approach using five European landscapes that represent different forest history phases in Scotland, Germany, Ukraine and Russia. Additionally, we illustrate the need to learn from reference landscapes for natural forest and cultural woodland systems such as in economically remote regions in Romania, Russia and on the Iberian Peninsula. We conclude that there is great opportunity for innovative knowledge production about both governance and management for different SFM dimensions based on comparisons among concrete landscapes. In addition, there is a need to develop local place-based social learning processes that are characterized by a focus on a geographical area, commitment to SFM policy visions and collaborative approaches to development that include both ecological and social systems.
- Research Article
76
- 10.1016/j.oneear.2021.01.011
- Feb 1, 2021
- One Earth
Eighty-six EU policy options for reducing imported deforestation
- Research Article
9
- 10.3390/earth6020021
- Mar 31, 2025
- Earth
The adverse effects of climate change, which are associated with the rise in greenhouse gases, impact all nations worldwide. In this context, tropical forests play a critical role in carbon sequestration. However, the significant anthropogenic pressure on these forests contributes to accelerated deforestation and a decrease in their capacity to regulate the climate. This study uses a comprehensive review of 176 published scientific articles and reports to assess the carbon sequestration capacity of rubber plantations, comparing their effectiveness with that of natural tropical forests. The findings are largely consistent and indicate that agricultural systems, such as rubber plantations, which were not traditionally associated with carbon sequestration, play a significant role in this area. Rubber plantations present a complementary alternative to the rapid deforestation of tropical forests, with the capacity to sequester substantial amounts of carbon. The range of carbon storage potential for rubber plantations, spanning from 30 to over 100 tons per hectare, rivals that of natural tropical forests, which can store over 300 tons per hectare. Furthermore, rubber plantations are notable for their indirect carbon sequestration potential. By providing a sustainable source of latex and wood, and thus income, they can reduce the pressure on natural tropical forests. However, challenges remain, particularly concerning sustainable management and the integration of rubber plantations into sustainable tropical forest management strategies. This analysis focuses on the opportunities and challenges of rubber plantations as an offset solution for carbon sequestration. It highlights the prospects for effectively integrating these plantations into sustainable tropical forest management policies.
- Research Article
3
- 10.1016/j.forpol.2007.12.002
- Mar 5, 2008
- Forest Policy and Economics
A marginal cost analysis of trade-offs in old-growth preservation in Ontario
- Research Article
3
- 10.1007/s10661-020-8230-5
- Apr 29, 2020
- Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Forest landscape change is affected by a complex mix of multiple interacting factors, including the biophysical environment, socioeconomic activities, cultural contexts, and forest management. Here, we investigated the temporal and spatial changes in forested land in Sichuan, China, using forest resource inventory data from 1980 to 2015. The factors that drove forest landscape conversion included environmental and socioeconomic characteristics, and forest operations. We also used spatial techniques to allow for neighborhood effects from forest land use activities in neighboring areas. We found that forest landscapes were very dynamic, with high change and high turnover in forest type and cover, but with an overall net gain. Spatial regression models showed strong neighborhood effects. Forest operations such as afforestation and protected areas had positive effects on forest gain. Meanwhile, forest land use changes resulting from forest programs (in Sichuan, mainly the Grain to Green Program and Natural Forest Conservation Program) were the major driving factors for increasing forest areas and improving forest conditions, tempered by local conditions of topography, climate, demography, and economy. The effective implementation of sustainable forest management strategy and policy can increase forest quality and quantity and maintain ecological function.
- Preprint Article
- 10.5194/egusphere-egu24-14942
- Mar 9, 2024
Integrated Water Resources Management (IWRM) stands as a globally advocated approach heralded for its promise to orchestrate equitable and coordinated water allocation, usage, and governance. However, its implementation varies significantly across different river basins and countries. Transboundary water resources management in the Aral Sea basin presents a critical environmental and political challenge in the region, bringing concerns not only to basin countries, including Kazakhstan, Kyrgyz Republic, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan but also to external actors.  The European Union (EU) has emerged as a pivotal donor in developing sustainable water resource management since the early 1990s. The EU's involvement stems from recognizing water challenges as potential threats to regional security and stability and fosters diverse regional and bilateral water programs and projects. This study delved into the evolution of the EU policies concerning environment and water management in the Aral Sea basin, focusing on promoting IWRM, raising environmental awareness, and building capacities. Methodologically, the research employed semi-structured interviews conducted with national, regional, and international experts engaged in EU initiatives, along with a synthesis of academic publications, EU official documents, and recent reports.  Research reveals the changes in EU water policy in Central Asia since the 2000s, including shifts in objectives, the scale of cooperation, and the interplay between EU policies and the perceptions, responses, and shaping by regional actors. The EU has successfully promoted certain norms of ‘good water governance,’ and Central Asian countries have, to a certain degree, adopted them in their policies and legal frameworks. However, The EU's reliance on soft tools and multi-stakeholder dialogues, limited financial commitments, coordination challenges, and local political constraints have constrained its impact on the ground. This situation has created a palpable sense of 'dialogue fatigue' among national stakeholders. The contextual disparities, divergent interests, and issues at stake between the EU and Central Asian countries pose significant obstacles to transferring EU experiences and practices. Central Asian actors' responses to EU water initiatives, amid the influence of the external and internal political environment, bear implications for sustainable water management. These implications are particularly pressing given the region's vulnerability to climate variability, the geopolitical landscape, and the countries' capacity to navigate multiple crises.
- Research Article
93
- 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.11.028
- Dec 17, 2015
- Land Use Policy
Deforestation and timber production in Congo after implementation of sustainable forest management policy
- Research Article
95
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2012.07.005
- Aug 4, 2012
- Forest Ecology and Management
Fire in managed forests of eastern Canada: Risks and options
- Research Article
2
- 10.7176/jrdm/73-06
- Feb 1, 2021
- Journal of Resources Development and Management
Following the rate with which forest resources get degraded, increasing attention has been paid to the conscious and sound efforts towards mainstreaming appropriate interventions to halt the menace. Following the United Nations Conference on Environment and Development held in Rio 1992, the idea of sustainable forest management has become popular in the international arena which admonishes various member-states and local governments to adopt policies and laws to enhance sustainable forest practices. The idea of SFM has been reinforced by the recent Reducing Emissions from Deforestation and forest degradation sustainable biodiversity management (REDD+) policy. In that regard, attention to laws, policies and institutions towards sustainable forest management has increased. This paper adopts a desk review approach to assess the role of forest-related policies on sustainable forest management practices. Essential tools and strategies for SFM are discussed, including measures to enhance enforcement of SFM policies and procedures. The study argues that actor constellation; autonomy to local actors and external actors involved are crucial in the drive towards sustainable forest management. Keywords: sustainable forest management; policies; institutions; community involvement; enforcement DOI: 10.7176/JRDM/73-06 Publication date: February 28 th 2021
- Research Article
35
- 10.1016/j.foreco.2014.10.032
- Nov 20, 2014
- Forest Ecology and Management
Understanding fire patterns and fire drivers for setting a sustainable management policy of the New-Caledonian biodiversity hotspot
- Research Article
6
- 10.1016/j.forpol.2012.05.002
- Jun 7, 2012
- Forest Policy and Economics
Sustainable forest management policy and the analysis of convergence effects on timber production
- Book Chapter
- 10.1016/b978-0-444-63998-1.00018-5
- Jan 1, 2019
- Developments in Soil Science
Chapter 18 - Environmental policy and forest soil conservation: Canada's experience to date