Balancing the equation: The significance of professional and lay perceptions in the promotion of cervical screening amongst minority ethnic women

Abstract

Studies of minority ethnic women and cancer screening have, in the past, suffered from many theoretical and methodological weaknesses. In addition, no attempts have been made to study the complexity of the issue involved in the intercultural context, or the possible contribution of women's experiences to low uptake rates. In order to further our understanding of the issues, an alternative approach, participatory action research (PAR), was adopted to identify factors that might have contributed to the persistently low participation of minority ethnic women in the cervical screening programme, and address them collaboratively. This paper presents the key findings of the ‘problem identification' phase of the project. Using mainly the focus-group method, it explores both smear takers' and minority ethnic women's perceptions and experiences of cervical screening. Data suggest that there was a divergence in perceptions held by these groups regarding cervical screening, which contributed to negative experiences for both groups. There is also clear evidence of dysfunctional clinical communication arising from these differing perceptions. Opportunistic screening at post-natal examination adopted by many general practices appeared to have perpetuated the perceptions that the majority of minority ethnic women held about the purpose of the smear test. Compounded by language differences, the majority of women who had undergone smear testing understood neither the purpose of screening programme nor the procedure of the test. This has clear implications for promoting regular uptake, and more importantly for informed consent and choice.