Abstract

Initially the connection between divinity and infinity was accompanied by an initial notion of infinity in the literal sense of one, another one, and so on – without an end, endless. Via Anaxagoras we reach Aristotle for whom it would be contradictory to hold that God is infinite, because the unlimited nature of infinity cannot be reconciled with the fullness of being of perfect reason. After Origen it was Gregor von Nyssa who positively affirmed that infinity belongs to the essence of God. Augustine was also more explicit in his view of infinity, because, according to him, the set of ‘all finite integers’ could be comprehended at once as an actual-infinite totality. An element of the thinking of Thomas Aquinas acknowledges that God’s infinity could be known, albeit in an inadequate manner. Aquinas continues key elements of the Greek-Medieval tradition, for according to him, in eternity there is no succession, because it exists totally at once. Cusanus took God as the actual infinite to be the coincidentia oppositorum . Descartes defends the view that the infinite, which is God, is known before the finite. Kant aptly introduces the expression ‘successive infinite’ but rejects the idea of an infinite totality. After Kant Maimon distinguishes between the human mind and a divine mind associated with succession and at once respectively. Hegel grasped the distinction between ordinal and cardinal numbers. Bolzano, Weierstrass, Dedekind and Cantor explored the at once infinite mathematically. Finally, what has been explained thus far sheds light on the struggle of theologians with the assumption that infinity is actually a theological notion (God’s infinity) transferred to mathematics.

Highlights

  • Background perspectives on infinity and GodRead online: Scan this QR code with your smart phone or mobile device to read online.Initially the connection between divinity and infinity was accompanied by an initial notion of infinity in the literal sense of one, another one, and so on – without an end, endless

  • Sweeny points out that mathematical connotations soon emerged alongside reflections about origins

  • The primary mathematical understanding of the infinite is given in the basic awareness of the succession of one, another one, yet another one – and so on indefinitely, infinitely

Read more

Summary

Background perspectives on infinity and God

Read online: Scan this QR code with your smart phone or mobile device to read online. After Origen it was Gregor von Nyssa who positively affirmed that infinity belongs to the essence of God. Augustine was more explicit in his view of infinity, because, according to him, the set of ‘all finite integers’ could be comprehended at once as an actualinfinite totality. An element of the thinking of Thomas Aquinas acknowledges that God’s infinity could be known, albeit in an inadequate manner. Aquinas continues key elements of the Greek-Medieval tradition, for according to him, in eternity there is no succession, because it exists totally at once. Descartes defends the view that the infinite, which is God, is known before the finite. What has been explained far sheds light on the struggle of theologians with the assumption that infinity is a theological notion (God’s infinity) transferred to mathematics

Greek roots
Introducing the infinitely small
Open Access
The essential being of things in a world of change
The primordial opposition of pure matter and pure form
From Thomas and Cusanus to Descartes
Arithmetising mathematics on the basis of the actual infinite
Infinity and God
Theology and the infinity of God
Is infinity brought into mathematics on a Christian theological foundation?
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.