Abstract

PurposeMost techniques used for automatic segmentation of subcortical brain regions are developed for three-dimensional (3D) MR images. MRIs obtained in non-specialist hospitals may be non-isotropic and two-dimensional (2D). Automatic segmentation of 2D images may be challenging and represents a lost opportunity to perform quantitative image analysis. We determine the performance of a modified subcortical segmentation technique applied to 2D images in patients with idiopathic generalised epilepsy (IGE).MethodsVolume estimates were derived from 2D (0.4 × 0.4 × 3 mm) and 3D (1 × 1x1mm) T1-weighted acquisitions in 31 patients with IGE and 39 healthy controls. 2D image segmentation was performed using a modified FSL FIRST (FMRIB Integrated Registration and Segmentation Tool) pipeline requiring additional image reorientation, cropping, interpolation and brain extraction prior to conventional FIRST segmentation. Consistency between segmentations was assessed using Dice coefficients and volumes across both approaches were compared between patients and controls. The influence of slice thickness on consistency was further assessed using 2D images with slice thickness increased to 6 mm.ResultsAll average Dice coefficients showed excellent agreement between 2 and 3D images across subcortical structures (0.86–0.96). Most 2D volumes were consistently slightly lower compared to 3D volumes. 2D images with increased slice thickness showed lower agreement with 3D images with lower Dice coefficients (0.55–0.83). Significant volume reduction of the left and right thalamus and putamen was observed in patients relative to controls across 2D and 3D images.ConclusionAutomated subcortical volume estimation of 2D images with a resolution of 0.4 × 0.4x3mm using a modified FIRST pipeline is consistent with volumes derived from 3D images, although this consistency decreases with an increased slice thickness. Thalamic and putamen atrophy has previously been reported in patients with IGE. Automated subcortical volume estimation from 2D images is feasible and most reliable at using in-plane acquisitions greater than 1 mm x 1 mm and provides an opportunity to perform quantitative image analysis studies in clinical trials.

Highlights

  • Automated segmentation and volume estimation of brain structures on magnetic resonance (MR) images offer a substantial advantage in epilepsy research

  • Quantitative MRI methods can be incorporated into clinical evaluation of patients with refractory epilepsy who are being considered for neurosurgery, and volumetric data can be included in prognostic models of treatment outcome in clinical trials

  • Paired t-tests show that volumes derived from 3D images were slightly but consistently and significantly (P < 0.001) larger for each region of interest (ROI), with the exception of the right accumbens, relative to the same ROIs obtained from 2D images (Table 3; Fig. 3)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Automated segmentation and volume estimation of brain structures on magnetic resonance (MR) images offer a substantial advantage in epilepsy research. Quantitative MRI methods can be incorporated into clinical evaluation of patients with refractory epilepsy who are being considered for neurosurgery, and volumetric data can be included in prognostic models of treatment outcome in clinical trials. Automated methods are traditionally applied to three-dimensional (3D) image data that have isotropic voxels and full head coverage This can be problematic for clinical trials as MRI data may be obtained from non-specialist centres; image data collected here may be two-dimensional (2D), non-isotropic and lacking full spatial head coverage. The ability to automatically segment and quantify volumes from 2D MR images routinely acquired in non-specialist hospitals may provide important information in prognostic models of treatment outcome in clinical trials

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.