Abstract
Background: Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is one of the most commonly used imaging technique for the management of vascular diseases. Here, we aimed to develop a hybrid method combining a feature-based expert system with a supervised deep learning (DL) algorithm to enable a fully automatic segmentation of the abdominal vascular tree. Methods: We proposed an algorithm based on the hybridization of a data-driven convolutional neural network and a knowledge-based model dedicated to vascular system segmentation. By using two distinct datasets of CTA from patients to evaluate independence to training dataset, the accuracy of the hybrid method for lumen and thrombus segmentation was evaluated compared to the feature-based expert system alone and to the ground truth provided by a human expert. Results: The hybrid approach demonstrated a better accuracy for lumen segmentation compared to the expert system alone (volume similarity: 0.8128 vs. 0.7912, p = 0.0006 and Dice similarity coefficient: 0.8266 vs. 0.7942, p < 0.0001). The accuracy for thrombus segmentation was also enhanced using the hybrid approach (volume similarity: 0.9404 vs. 0.9185, p = 0.0027 and Dice similarity coefficient: 0.8918 vs. 0.8654, p < 0.0001). Conclusions: By enabling a robust and fully automatic segmentation, the method could be used to develop real-time decision support to help in the management of vascular diseases.
Highlights
Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is one of the most commonly used imaging techniques to evaluate the vascular tree [1,2,3]
Segmentation of the vascular system is of the utmost importance in medical image analysis since the evaluation of the arterial vascularization is useful for the diagnosis of cardiovascular diseases and represents a critical step to assess the prognosis or plan a surgical intervention in a wide range of diseases including traumatology or oncology [1]
We proposed to evaluate the gain of hybridizing supervised deep learning (DL) algorithm to a feature-based expert system to perform a fully automated segmentation of the abdominal vascular tree in human from CTA-scans
Summary
Computed tomography angiography (CTA) is one of the most commonly used imaging techniques to evaluate the vascular tree [1,2,3]. By using two distinct datasets of CTA from patients to evaluate independence to training dataset, the accuracy of the hybrid method for lumen and thrombus segmentation was evaluated compared to the feature-based expert system alone and to the ground truth provided by a human expert. Results: The hybrid approach demonstrated a better accuracy for lumen segmentation compared to the expert system alone (volume similarity: 0.8128 vs 0.7912, p = 0.0006 and Dice similarity coefficient: 0.8266 vs 0.7942, p < 0.0001). The accuracy for thrombus segmentation was enhanced using the hybrid approach (volume similarity: 0.9404 vs 0.9185, p = 0.0027 and Dice similarity coefficient: 0.8918 vs 0.8654, p < 0.0001)
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Dice Similarity Coefficient
Management Of Vascular Diseases
Thrombus Segmentation
Expert System
Hybrid Approach
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
Journal of Urology
Sep 1, 2021
Cardiovascular Engineering and Technology
Jan 8, 2022
The Journal of Urology
Apr 21, 2021
Academic Radiology
May 1, 2020
BioMed Research International
Dec 14, 2021
Journal of Urology
Sep 1, 2021
Journal of Applied Clinical Medical Physics
Apr 1, 2022
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
Feb 1, 2021
Medical Physics
May 4, 2022
International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics
Oct 1, 2023
arXiv: Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition
Jan 31, 2019
Chinese Journal of Radiation Oncology
Mar 15, 2020
Frontiers in Biomedical Technologies
Mar 30, 2021
IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging
Apr 1, 2005
Journal of X-ray science and technology
Dec 20, 2021
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Nov 24, 2023
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Nov 24, 2023
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Nov 24, 2023
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Nov 24, 2023
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Nov 24, 2023
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Nov 24, 2023
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Nov 24, 2023
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Nov 24, 2023
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Nov 24, 2023
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Nov 24, 2023