Abstract

The term “pain threshold” refers to the measurement of the intensity of a physical stimulus that evokes pain. To estimate the pain threshold, a mechanical or electrical stimulus with increasing intensity is usually applied until the subject under evaluation refers to a pain sensation. This study aims to evaluate the autoalgometric pain threshold as a perfect technique to determine the effects of stimulation rate in relation to both gender and the site of stimulation. In this experimental model, pressure algometry was applied: the subject under evaluation pushed a finger against a small round metal tip, producing and at the same time controlling the intensity of the noxious stimulus. Through autoalgometry, the stimulus intensity was recorded over time, measuring the force change rate applied and studying the subject’s behavior on approaching pain. This test was performed with 50 healthy volunteers on two days, applying a fast or slow rate of stimulation. The results described demonstrate that there is a positive correlation between the pressure increase rate and the pressure threshold evaluation. In light of these findings, autoalgometry can be proposed as an objective measure of pressure pain threshold for clinical and research use.

Highlights

  • Pain has a conservative effect for humans and animals, to avoid harming the body and to search for a remedy if any harm occurs

  • Pain is one of the most relevant clinical symptoms; it is the main reason to ask for medical help

  • Autoalgometry permits study of the slope of stimulus intensity. This parameter is of interest for at least two reasons: (1) it can be indicative of personal propensity to tolerate pain, and (2) it can affect the threshold favored by the algometric procedure

Read more

Summary

Journal of Clinical Medicine

Letizia Lorusso 1 , Monica Salerno 2, Francesco Sessa 2, Daniela Nicolosi 3, Lucia Longhitano 3, Carla Loreto 3, Marco Carotenuto 4, Antonietta Messina 5, Vincenzo Monda 5, Ines Villano 5, Giuseppe Cibelli 2, Anna Valenzano 2, Marcellino Monda 5, Paolo Murabito 6, Maria Pina Mollica 7, Giovanni Messina 2,* and Andrea Viggiano 1.

Introduction
Findings
Discussion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.