Abstract
Abstract We report results from an experiment in which two firms compete for a public project by submitting offers of quality and bribery to a public official. We study the impact of audience effects (transparency) and other regarding preferences (accountability) on corruption by introducing a citizen who either observes, or is affected by the transactions, or both. The results suggest that transparency and accountability lead, independently, to lower bribe placement and acceptance. However, the conjoined effect does not promote prosocial behaviour further, indicating potential ceiling effects.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
