Abstract

To study whether replacement of nosocomial ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (ARE) clones by vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VRE), belonging to the same genetic lineages, increases mortality in patients with E. faecium bacteremia, and to evaluate whether any such increase is mediated by a delay in appropriate antibiotic therapy. Retrospective, matched-cohort study. The study included 20 Dutch and Danish hospitals from 2009 to 2014. Within the study period, 63 patients with VRE bacteremia (36 Dutch and 27 Danish) were identified and subsequently matched to 234 patients with ARE bacteremia (130 Dutch and 104 Danish) for hospital, ward, length of hospital stay prior to bacteremia, and age. For all patients, 30-day mortality after bacteremia onset was assessed. The risk ratio (RR) reflecting the impact of vancomycin resistance on 30-day mortality was estimated using Cox regression with further analytic control for confounding factors. The 30-day mortality rates were 27% and 38% for ARE in the Netherlands and Denmark, respectively, and the 30-day mortality rates were 33% and 48% for VRE in these respective countries. The adjusted RR for 30-day mortality for VRE was 1.54 (95% confidence interval, 1.06-2.25). Although appropriate antibiotic therapy was initiated later for VRE than for ARE bacteremia, further analysis did not reveal mediation of the increased mortality risk. Compared to ARE bacteremia, VRE bacteremia was associated with higher 30-day mortality. One explanation for this association would be increased virulence of VRE, although both phenotypes belong to the same well-characterized core genomic lineage. Alternatively, it may be the result of unmeasured confounding.

Highlights

  • Compared to ampicillin-resistant Enterococcus faecium (ARE) bacteremia, vancomycin-resistant E. faecium (VRE) bacteremia was associated with higher 30-day mortality

  • In the Netherlands and Denmark, ampicillin-resistant, vancomycin-susceptible E. faecium (ARE) has been the dominant hospital phenotype of Enterococcus faecium for years, stably contributing to >80% of all invasive E. faecium isolates.[1,2]. These countries are faced with increased polyclonal hospital outbreaks of E. faecium with combined resistance to ampicillin and vancomycin (VRE).[3,4]

  • In the Netherlands, 1%–2% of invasive E. faecium isolates are VRE, and in Denmark, prevalence had risen to 11% by 2019, with particular predominance in the capital region.[2,9]

Read more

Summary

Methods

The risk ratio (RR) reflecting the impact of vancomycin resistance on 30-day mortality was estimated using Cox regression with further analytic control for confounding factors. By means of matching, patients with ARE bacteremia and with underlying disease severity similar to the VRE bacteremia patients were chosen as comparison group. We controlled for remaining imbalances in confounding factors after matching by means of adjustments in multivariable models. This method resulted in a retrospective, matched-cohort study in which episodes of bacteremia caused by E. faecium with co-resistance to ampicillin and vancomycin (designated VRE) were compared to control episodes of bacteremia caused by E. faecium with resistance to ampicillin and susceptibility to vancomycin (designated ARE). For matching length of hospital stay prior to bacteremia, the matching interval was determined such that from at least 5 ARE bacteremias (if available), patients could be selected with age most similar to the patient with VRE bacteremia (Supplementary Material online)

Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.