Attentional bias for alcohol-related cues in a clinical setting among patients with alcohol use disorder: Evidence from eye movements and reaction times.

Alcohol-related attentional biases in recently detoxified inpatients with severe alcohol use disorder: an eye-tracking approach

Competing models disagree on three theoretical questions regarding alcohol-related attentional bias (AB), a key process in severe alcohol use disorder (SAUD): (1) is AB more of a trait (fixed, associated with alcohol use severity) or state (fluid, associated with momentary craving states) characteristic of SAUD; (2) does AB purely reflect the over-activation of the reflexive/reward system or is it also influenced by the activity of the reflective/control system and (3) does AB rely upon early or later processing stages? We addressed these issues by investigating the time-course of AB and its modulation by subjective craving and cognitive load in SAUD. A free-viewing eye-tracking task, presenting pictures of alcoholic and non-alcoholic beverages, combined with a concurrent cognitive task with three difficulty levels. A laboratory setting in the detoxification units of three Belgian hospitals. We included 30 patients with SAUD self-reporting craving at testing time, 30 patients with SAUD reporting a total absence of craving and 30 controls matched on sex and age. All participants from SAUD groupsmet the DSM-5 criteria for SAUD. We assessed AB through early and late eye-tracking indices. We evaluated the modulation of AB by craving (comparison between patients with/without craving) and cognitive load (variation of AB with the difficulty level of the concurrent task). Dwell time measure indicated that SAUDpatients with craving allocated more attention towards alcohol-related stimuli than patients without craving (P < 0.001, d = 1.093), resulting in opposite approach/avoidance AB according to craving presence/absence. SAUD patients without craving showed a stronger avoidance AB than controls (P = 0.003, d = 0.806). AB did not vary according to cognitive load (P = 0.962, η2 p = 0.004). The direction of alcohol-related attentional bias (approach/avoidance) appears to be determined by patients' subjective craving at testing time and does not function as a stable trait of severe alcohol use disorder. Alcohol-related attentional bias appears to rely on later/controlled attentional stages but is not modulated by the saturation of the reflective/control system.

To identify how psychiatric co-morbidity was identified and assessed, in studies of attentional bias in clinical samples of patients with alcohol use disorders (AUDs). Systematic review methodology was used to identify studies and abstract data on alcohol-related attentional biases and measurement of psychiatric co-morbidity. Seventeen papers were identified that met the criteria for inclusion. All but one study were in patients meeting criteria for alcohol dependence. In 10 of the 17 studies, either no mention or minimal statements were made pertaining to possible co-morbid conditions (including other substance use): five excluded patients with psychiatric diagnoses, (variously defined), and two excluded patients on 'psychotropic medication'. Slow response latencies to all word types were found in studies where co-morbid conditions were not considered. Despite the high prevalence of psychiatric pathology in patients with AUDs (particularly depression), and the acknowledged impact that this has on aetiology, presentation and outcome, psychiatric co-morbidity has not been consistently measured or described in experimental studies on alcohol-related attentional biases in clinical samples. In order to have an accurate appreciation of the role of attentional biases in patients with AUDs, there needs to be a consistent approach to measuring the co-occurrence of other psychopathology. Further research is needed to assess the impact of co-morbidities on attentional biases in AUDs, to enable the development of more targeted psychological and pharmacological treatments.

Prominent models postulate that alcohol-related attentional bias (AB), emerging from the overactivation of the reward system, plays a key role in severe alcohol use disorder (sAUD) and is independent from voluntary control. We determined whether AB is indeed compulsive or can be modulated by the control/inhibition system. Patients with sAUD (17 women, 13 men, mean age of 47, White) and matched healthy controls (16 women, 14 men, mean age of 44, White) performed a visual probe task with behavioral (reaction time) and eye-tracking (first fixation location and duration, second fixation location, dwell time) measures. They also performed an avoidance task, requiring to focus on a target by voluntarily inhibiting eye movements toward alcohol/nonalcohol/nonappetitive distractors and measuring overt (break frequency) and covert (fixational eye movements) attentional processes. Patients with sAUD exhibited an avoidance AB indexed by (a) reduced attentional resources dedicated to alcohol-related stimuli, namely, reduced dwell time (p = .040) and second fixation (p = .001) toward these stimuli; (b) increased inhibitory processes, namely, easier inhibition of saccades toward alcohol measured by lower break frequency (p < .001); and (c) covert eye movements posited further away from alcohol. In contradiction with theoretical models, our two tasks did not show any AB toward alcohol in sAUD. Instead, patients exhibited an avoidance AB indexed by increased inhibitory processes as well as reduced overt and covert attentional resources dedicated to alcohol-related stimuli. These results question the theoretical and clinical role of AB, as measured through reliable eye-tracking tasks, in sAUD. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2025 APA, all rights reserved).

Alcohol-related attentional bias (AB) is thought to play a key role in the emergence and maintenance of excessive alcohol use. Recent models suggest that AB, classically considered as a permanent feature in alcohol use disorders, is rather modulated by temporary motivational states. We explored the influence of current mood and craving on AB in binge drinking, through a mood induction procedure combined with eye-tracking measures of AB. In Experiment 1, we measured AB (visual probe task with eye-tracking measures) among binge drinkers (n = 48) and light drinkers (n = 32) following positive, negative and neutral mood inductions. Participants reported subjective craving and mood before/after induction. In Experiment 2, we measured AB among the same binge drinkers compared with 29 moderate drinkers following alcohol-related negative, non-alcohol-related negative and neutral mood inductions. In Experiment 1, induced negative mood and group positively predicted subjective craving, which was positively associated with AB. We found no effect of induced positive mood nor a direct mood-AB association. In Experiment 2, the relationships AB presented with both induced negative mood and group were again mediated by craving. Inducing alcohol-related negative mood did not modify the mood-craving association. Alcohol-related AB is not a stable binge drinking characteristic but rather varies according to transient motivational (i.e., craving) and emotional (i.e., negative mood) states. This study provides important insights to better understand AB in subclinical populations and emphasizes the importance of considering motivational and affective states as intercorrelated, to offer multiple ways to reduce excessive alcohol use.

Reward sensitivity, attentional bias, and executive control in early adolescent alcohol use

College on the Problems of Drug Dependence Highlights from the 67th Annual Meeting

Alcohol use disorder (AUD) may be associated with increased attentional bias (AB) toward alcohol-related information. Accordingly, our aim was to explore the relationships between alcohol-related AB, cravings, and risk of relapse among individuals with AUD after treatment. The study group included 24 in-patients with AUD who had completed alcohol withdrawal management. AB was evaluated using an image-based task, with participants asked to select the nonalcoholic image as fast and as accurately as possible and the response time (RT) measured. The intensity of the desire to drink was evaluated using a 100-mm Visual Analog Scale and the risk of relapse using the Alcohol Relapse Risk Scale. Linear regression was used to evaluate the relationship between these variables, with age, gender, duration of hospitalization, and depression score used as covariates. Intensity of cravings was significantly associated with AB RT (R2 =.625) and risk of relapse of drinking behavior (Alcohol Relapse Risk Scale score, R2 =.64). Gender and γ-GTP were significant explanatory variables of identified relationships. The main limitations of our study are a higher proportion of men than women in our study group and the absence of a control group for baseline comparison of AB RTs. This study results suggested that the desire to drink is related to AB among patients with AUD and that the intensity of the desire to drink is related to the risk of a relapse in drinking behavior after AUD treatment.

To examine whether alcohol-related attentional bias (AB) can be reduced by training heavy drinkers to attend to soft drinks as an alternative to alcohol. Diminishing AB is important because AB has been suggested to be a significant factor in the development, maintenance and relapse of addictive behaviours. AB was trained in a clinically relevant design, and we studied the generalization of this training. DESIGN, PARTICIPANTS AND INTERVENTION: We assigned randomly 106 heavy drinking male college and university students to the attentional re-training (AR; modified visual-probe task) or control condition (standard visual-probe task). Laboratory at Maastricht University. We measured the effects of AR on the visual-probe task with stimuli that were presented in the AR and with new stimuli, and on an alternative measure of AB, the flicker paradigm. We further measured effects on craving and preference for either an alcohol beverage or a soft drink. After AR, participants had learned to avoid alcohol stimuli and had developed an AB for soft drinks. This effect was restricted to stimuli used in the AR. The flicker task, where AB for alcohol was found in both the AR and control groups, was not affected by the AR. No effect was found on craving and the preference task. Although heavy drinkers can learn to attend selectively to an alternative category for alcohol, a single AR is not sufficient to decrease symptoms of problem drinking.

Individuals with alcohol use disorders (AUDs) who smoke cigarettes experience greater health risks than those using either substance alone. Further, disparities exist in AUDs and smoking by race/ethnicity. Although smoking has declined in the general population, it is not known whether the smoking prevalence has changed over time for individuals with AUDs. The current study used representative U.S. data to estimate the prevalence of current cigarette use from 2002 to 2016 by AUD status and severity overall and by race/ethnicity. Data were drawn from the National Survey on Drug Use and Health, an annual cross-sectional study of U.S. individuals, from 2002 to 2016 (total analytic sample n=837,326). Cigarette smoking prevalence was calculated annually among those with and without past-year AUD and by AUD severity level (mild, moderate, severe AUD). Time trends in smoking prevalence by AUD status and severity were tested using logistic regression for the overall sample and significant interactions were subsequently stratified by race/ethnicity (non-Hispanic [NH] White, NH Black, Hispanic, NH Other). Cigarette use was persistently over twice as common among those with AUDs compared to without AUDs (2016: 37.84% vs. 16.29%). Cigarette use was also more common among those at each level of AUD severity criteria (2016: mild AUD 34.59%; moderate AUD 35.35%; severe AUD 52.23%). Approximately half of NH Black respondents with AUDs, and three-quarters of NH Black respondents with severe AUDs, reported smoking in 2016. The prevalence of smoking decreased significantly over time among respondents with and without AUDs; however, there were differences by race. There was no decline in smoking prevalence among NH Black respondents with AUDs over time in contrast to a significant decrease for every other racial/ethnic group with and without AUDs. Individuals with AUDs may need additional resources and interventions to quit smoking, especially NH Black individuals.

Sexual minority individuals have heightened risk for substance use; however, previous studies have not assessed severity of alcohol use disorders (AUDs), tobacco use disorders (TUDs), and drug use disorders (DUDs) among lesbian/gay and bisexual individuals and those "not sure" of their sexual identity compared with heterosexual individuals. This study examined how three dimensions of sexual orientation (identity, attraction, and behavior) relate to severity of AUD, TUD, and DUD. This study used cross-sectional national data (N = 36,309) from the National Epidemiologic Survey on Alcohol and Related Conditions-III, and well-validated alcohol, tobacco, and drug measures that align with Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition criteria. Data were collected through in-person interviews in 2012-2013. Sexual minority respondents, based on sexual identity, had higher odds of severe AUD or TUD than heterosexual respondents. Opposite- and same-sex behavior was a predictor of severe AUD (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.24-4.79) and TUD (AOR = 2.16; 95% CI = 1.19-3.93), but not DUD. Those "not sure" of their sexual identity had higher odds of severe AUD, TUD, and DUD: AUD (AOR = 5.05; 95% CI = 2.78-9.16), TUD (AOR = 4.18; 95% CI = 2.29-7.64), and DUD (AOR = 4.40; 95% CI = 1.72-11.2), than heterosexual respondents. There were few significant differences between "not sure" and bisexual respondents. These findings provide strong evidence that bisexual and "not sure" U.S. adults are more likely to have a severe AUD and TUD. They also demonstrate the importance of treatment strategies that address sexual minority-specific risks, particularly for bisexual individuals and those "not sure" of their sexual identity.

Offspring of parents with alcohol use disorder (AUD) have elevated risk of substance use. However, few studies have comprehensively assessed risks associated with different substances. This study investigated the risk of substance use disorders (SUDs) in adult children with severe parental AUD over four decades, contributing information on the risk of each disorder, the roles of important risk factors, and the general versus substance-specific nature of SUD risk. Swedish national register data were used to follow children with and without ≥ 1 parent with an inpatient diagnosis of AUD from 1973 to 2018 to investigate risk of alcohol, opioid, cannabinoid, sedative/hypnotic, cocaine, other stimulant, hallucinogen, volatile solvent, and multiple drug use disorder. The composite outcomes any SUD, 1 SUD, and ≥ 2 SUDs including and excluding AUD were also investigated. Severe parental AUD and outcomes were defined with hospital inpatient diagnoses (ICD codes). Hazard ratios (HRs) were calculated with Cox regression. Model 1: unadjusted. Model 2: adjusted for child’s sex, parental education, and parental mortality. Model 3: Model 2 plus parental SUD. Model 4: Model 3 plus parental psychiatric disorder. Risks of all outcomes were higher in those with (n = 99,723) than without (n = 2,321,756) severe parental AUD. For SUD diagnoses, the highest unadjusted risks were for other stimulant (HR 5.33, 95% CI 5.03–5.64), volatile solvent (HR 4.95, 95% CI 3.98–6.15), and opioid (HR 4.62, 95% CI 4.37–4.87) use disorders. After full adjustment, risks declined, and HRs of the different diagnoses converged to approximately twice as high in the adult children of parents with AUD. Risks of any SUD and of ≥ 2 SUDs were more elevated (95% CIs did not overlap) when AUD was included than when AUD was excluded. Risk of ≥ 2 SUDs was higher than risk of 1 SUD, but only when AUD was included. Severe parental AUD was associated with elevated risk for all SUDs. After full adjustment, SUD risks declined and converged but remained doubled. Sociodemographic factors, parental SUD, and parental psychiatric disorder explained much of the excess risk. Drug combinations that included alcohol elevated the risk of ≥ 2 SUDs and any SUD.

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a serious public health concern that is highly prevalent among couples with alcohol misuse. It is well-established that alcohol can exacerbate negative IPV outcomes; however, less is known about how hazardous alcohol consumption, combined with family composition, such as the presence of children in the home, may impact IPV in a dyadic context. The current study examined the separate and interactive roles of the couple's caretaking status and alcohol use disorder (AUD) severity on psychological and physical IPV victimization. Secondary data were analyzed from 100 couples considered high risk due to reporting physical IPV and at least one partner meeting criteria for AUD. Multilevel mixture models were used to dyadically test how caretaking status and each partner's AUD severity, separately and interactively, related to the couple's psychological and physical IPV severity. Caretaking status and one's own AUD severity, when examined separately, were positively related to psychological and physical IPV victimization. One's partner's AUD severity was also related to severity of physical IPV victimization. There was no evidence of an interaction in this sample. Caretaking status played an important role in IPV victimization even when accounting for AUD in high-risk couples. Caretaking status and AUD did not interact; however, the significant main effects suggest an additive association, such that the combination of AUD severity and caretaking is more risky for IPV victimization than either factor alone. Findings highlight the importance of considering family composition and alcohol use behaviors on IPV risk.

Concurrent use of alcohol with other drugs and DSM-5 alcohol use disorder comorbid with other drug use disorders: Sociodemographic characteristics, severity, and psychopathology

The COVID-19 pandemic increased alcohol consumption in the USA as a result of widespread individual changes in drinking patterns. Few studies have utilized longitudinal data allowing the prediction of increased or decreased drinking from COVID-19 economic, social, and health impacts. Data are from 1819 respondents in the 2019-20 National Alcohol Survey and a one-year follow-up in early 2021. Changes in past-year alcohol volume, drinking days, days with 5+ drinks, and Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fifth Edition (DSM-5) alcohol use disorder (AUD) severity were measured as outcomes. Measures of COVID-19 economic, health, and social impacts were assessed for the individual and household. Economic impacts were combined into Self and Household scores. Analyses utilized multinomial logistic regression models to estimate meaningful increases or decreases in outcomes, while generalized estimating equation models estimated overall effects. Increases in alcohol use and AUD severity were larger and more prevalent than decreases, and differences between sociodemographic groups in the prevalence of meaningful increases and decreases were found. Models of meaningful changes found that higher self-economic impact scores predicted increases in 5+ days and AUD severity. Generalized estimating equation models also found that the self-economic impact score predicted increased AUD severity and additionally that being an essential worker was associated with reductions in alcohol volume and 5+ days. Substantial changes in drinking and AUD severity were observed, with increases in these outcomes being more prevalent and larger than decreases. Results highlight the importance of the pandemic's economic impacts in predicting changes in drinking and AUD severity.