Abstract
This research addresses the possibility of direct criminal investigation by public attorney. Through bibliographical studies, it aims to present an exploratory and descriptive view of the fundamentals and limits addicted to the function of public attorney. It is also about non-exclusiveness of the police in conducting criminal investigations, because, according to the Federal Constitution and the Criminal Procedure Code, other administrative staff can perform them. Among these, there is the Public Prosecution Service, when the crime is subject to public attorney. Finally, the positions of the Supreme Court are observed. Certainly the major jurisprudential position focuses on the constitutionality of direct criminal investigation by the public attorney, but other placements are also found which hinders its legal treatment, harming both the accused as the whole society. It is concluded that the performance of the Brazilian public attorney in a criminal investigation is entirely possible and consistent with its constitutional purpose in a direct way to preserve the fundamental human rights. Key words: criminal investigation, public attorney, supreme court.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Revista de Estudos Constitucionais Hermenêutica e Teoria do Direito
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.