Abstract
This chapter introduces the third part of this book—geographical ways of knowing the north—and, focusing on the impact of scientific knowledge on landscape appreciation, addresses some apparent dualities or paradoxes in Romantic-scientific travelogues.1 These include long-accepted, apparent conflicts between Romanticism and the sciences, and the promulgation of myths of the north set against the gathering and presentation of empirical fact. Examination of these apparent paradoxes contributes to this book’s rethinking of the complex interactions between these travelers’ scientific interests, the Romantic contexts of their travels, and British imaginings of the north. It also challenges ingrained, traditional assumptions about the qualities of Romantic and scientific texts, and scientific travelers’ relationships with and experiences of northern landscapes and peoples. These interactions cannot simply be viewed as colonial or imperialistic enterprises, nor as entertaining, heroic adventure stories. Here, they are appreciated as a complex intertwining of personal interests, the contemporary intellectual zeitgeist relating to imaginings of the north, and physical and psychological engagements with landscapes and peoples.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.