Abstract

Decades of research have established a model that includes the medial temporal lobe, and particularly the hippocampus, as a critical node for episodic memory. Neuroimaging and clinical studies have shown the involvement of additional cortical and subcortical regions. Among these areas, the thalamus, the retrosplenial cortex, and the prefrontal cortices have been consistently related to episodic memory performance. This article provides evidences that these areas are in different forms and degrees critical for human memory function rather than playing only an ancillary role. First we briefly summarize the functional architecture of the medial temporal lobe with respect to recognition memory and recall. We then focus on the clinical and neuroimaging evidence available on thalamo-prefrontal and thalamo-retrosplenial networks. The role of these networks in episodic memory has been considered secondary, partly because disruption of these areas does not always lead to severe impairments; to account for this evidence, we discuss methodological issues related to the investigation of these regions. We propose that these networks contribute differently to recognition memory and recall, and also that the memory stage of their contribution shows specificity to encoding or retrieval in recall tasks. We note that the same mechanisms may be in force when humans perform non-episodic tasks, e.g., semantic retrieval and mental time travel. Functional disturbance of these networks is related to cognitive impairments not only in neurological disorders, but also in psychiatric medical conditions, such as schizophrenia. Finally we discuss possible mechanisms for the contribution of these areas to memory, including regulation of oscillatory rhythms and long-term potentiation. We conclude that integrity of the thalamo-frontal and the thalamo-retrosplenial networks is necessary for the manifold features of episodic memory.

Highlights

  • As we argued for the thalamo-prefrontal cortex (PFC) network in Section “The Thalamo-Prefrontal Network,” the thalamo-retrosplenial and posterior cingulate cortex (RSC) network has been implicated in wider cognitive functions than recall

  • SUMMARY In this article we summarized evidence that beside the medial temporal lobe, two other brain networks are involved in memory processing

  • We argued that by using tests that tap recall it is possible to reveal the contribution of the thalamo-PFC network to episodic memory

Read more

Summary

Comments

Deficit interpreted as retrieval-dependent Deficit more evident after delay. Repeated exposure did not improve performance. On the basis of neurophysiological findings reviewed below, we propose that the features of the AT (in particular, the regulation of RSC plasticity) match the requirements to subserve this function In this view, the AT-RSC connections would underlie the generation of multiple memory traces, a role that includes retrieval processes (of the original memory trace) and re-encoding (generation of novel memory traces); on the cognitive side, this information flow could be a relevant path for the conversion of episodic into semantic memory traces. The interactions included phase-amplitude and amplitude-amplitude coupling and were established based on data from three patients receiving deep brain stimulation This evidence suggests that the contribution of the thalamoPFC network to episodic memory can be mediated by modulation of cortical oscillations induced by thalamic activity. We are still bound to the statement by James reported at the beginning of this review about empirical design of memory studies: recall seems to be the chief task to study episodic memory

Lateral MD lesion
Findings
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.