Abstract

BackgroundIn Finland, school doctors examine all children at predetermined ages in addition to annual health checks by school nurses. This study explored the association of study questionnaire-assessed need for and school doctor-evaluated benefit of routine health checks conducted by doctors.MethodsBetween August 2017 and August 2018, we recruited a random sample of 1341 children in grades 1 and 5 (aged seven and eleven years, respectively) from 21 elementary schools in four Finnish municipalities. Children mainly studying in special education groups or whose parents needed an interpreter were excluded. School nurses performed their health check as usual. Parents, nurses, and teachers then completed study questionnaires that assessed the concerns of parents, school nurses, and teachers regarding each child’s physical, mental and social health. Doctors, blinded to the responses, routinely examined all the children. The primary outcome measures were (1) the need for a health check based on the study questionnaires and (2) the benefit/harm of the appointment as estimated by the doctors according to predetermined criteria, and (3) the patient-reported experience measures (PREMs) of benefit/harm of the appointment as estimated by the parents and children. We compared the need for a health check with the doctor-evaluated benefit using multilevel logistic regression.ResultsThe participation rate was 75.5 %. According to all questionnaires, 20–25 % of the 1013 children had no need for a health check. The doctors regarded 410 (40.6 %) and the parents 812 (83.4 %) of the appointments as being beneficial. Respondents rarely reported harm. The children who were classified as needing a health check more often benefitted from the health check (assessed by the doctor) than children with no need for one (OR 3.53; 95 % CI 2.41–5.17).ConclusionsThe need for a health check is an important predictor of school-doctor evaluated benefit of the health check. This approach could allow school doctors to allocate time for the children who need them most.Trial registrationClinicalTrials.gov, Identifier NCT03178331, registration June 6th 2017.

Highlights

  • In Finland, school doctors examine all children at predetermined ages in addition to annual health checks by school nurses

  • A German study suggested that health checks by physicians at school entry could be reduced by targeting them at children who are at risk of a severe developmental disorder [15]

  • The primary aim of this study was to explore the association of study questionnaire-assessed need for and school doctorevaluated benefit of routine general health checks of elementary school children in grades 1 and 5

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In Finland, school doctors examine all children at predetermined ages in addition to annual health checks by school nurses. School health services exist in at least 102 countries [1] and provide a unique opportunity to identify and help children at risk of long-lasting physical, mental and social problems. Even in high-income nations, poorer children are at increased risk of adverse health outcomes [2]. One solution to this problem could be school-based health centers that can advance health equity [3]. Largescale interventions by school health services may be more cost-effective than individual screening procedures [4, 5]. Substantial gaps exist in the evidence supporting many preventive care recommendations such as behavioral counceling and screening which are often included in health checks [9]. A recent review found evidence supporting the implementation of anxiety prevention programs, asthma education, and vision screening [16]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.