Abstract

The high demands of academia and the fear of failure lead some university students to prioritize defending their personal worth through the use of complex strategies such as self-handicapping or defensive pessimism. Adopting a person-centered approach, this study established two objectives: First, to analyze the conformation of different motivational profiles based on the combination of self-esteem and achievement goals (learning, performance approach, and performance avoidance); and second, to determine if the identified profiles differ from one another in the use of self-handicapping and defensive pessimism. A total of 1028 university students participated in the research. Four motivational profiles were obtained: (a) High self-esteem, low learning goals, high performance approach goals, and high performance avoidance goals; (b) high self-esteem, high learning goals, low performance approach goals, and low performance avoidance goals; (c) low self-esteem, low learning goals, high performance approach goals, and high performance avoidance goals; and (d) low self-esteem, high learning goals, high performance approach goals, and medium performance avoidance goals. Profiles (c) and (d) were significantly related to self-handicapping and defensive pessimism, respectively. These results suggest that students with low self-esteem are more vulnerable to self-protection strategies. Additionally, under self-handicapping and defensive pessimism, the achievement goals are slightly different.

Highlights

  • In line with the challenges posed by the current social emphasis on self-directed and lifelong learning [1,2], university students are subject to high academic requirements

  • Some students manage this challenge with a clear orientation to success, indicating a high degree of motivation and enthusiasm for learning [3]. This demanding context poses a significant threat because they perceive academic failure as evidence of low self-worth [4]. Strategies such as self-handicapping or defensive pessimism are powerful incentives to protect their feelings of competence

  • Adopting a person-centered approach, this study aimed to analyze the formation of different motivational profiles from the combination of self-esteem and achievement goals

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In line with the challenges posed by the current social emphasis on self-directed and lifelong learning [1,2], university students are subject to high academic requirements Some students manage this challenge with a clear orientation to success, indicating a high degree of motivation and enthusiasm for learning [3]. For other students, this demanding context poses a significant threat because they perceive academic failure as evidence of low self-worth [4]. The role of self-esteem and achievement goals as motivational determinants of self-handicapping and defensive pessimism strategies is analyzed. The method used is intended to determine which student profiles are motivationally more vulnerable to self-worth protection strategies

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.