Association of body mass index and waist-to-height ratio with outcomes in ischemic stroke: results from the Third China National Stroke Registry

Abstract

Background and purposeConflicting reports of obesity paradox have led to confusion about weight management strategies for post-stroke patients. The main purpose of this study is to determine whether the obesity paradox measured by body mass index (BMI) or by waist-to-height ratio (WHtR) is real.MethodsWe evaluated the association of general obesity measured by BMI, and abdominal obesity measured by WHtR with 1-year all-cause mortality, recurrence of stroke and combined vascular events of acute ischemic stroke (AIS) patients in a cohort —— the Third China National Stroke Registry (CNSR-III). Cox proportional hazards models and restricted cubic splines were performed to investigate the association between obesity and clinical outcomes.ResultsA total of 14,146 patients with ischemic stroke were included. When BMI was used as a measure of obesity, compared to the normal weight patients, mortality decreased in overweight patients (hazard ratio [HR] 0.74 [95% confidence interval (CI) 0.61–0.91], P = 0.0035) and obese patients (HR 0.54 [0.40–0.73], P < 0.0001); and increased in underweight patients (HR 2.55 [1.75–3.73], P < 0.0001). After adjustment for confounding factors, the protective effect of obesity and overweight disappeared. BMI had no association with recurrence of stroke or combined vascular events. When WHtR was used as a measure of obesity, obese patients had lower 1-year all-cause mortality (HR 0.64 [0.43–0.97], P = 0.0357). After adjustment for confounding factors, this difference disappeared; overweight patients still had lower all-cause mortality (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] 0.42 [0.26–0.67], P = 0.0003), recurrence of stroke (aHR 0.77 [0.60–0.99], P = 0.0440) and combined vascular events (aHR 0.75 [0.58–0.95], P = 0.0198).ConclusionsAmong Chinese patients with AIS, our study does not support the BMI paradox; overweight patients measured by WHtR had a more favorable prognosis. TOAST subtypes did not modify the association.