Abstract

Accident statistics showed that vehicular collision caused serious shear damage or failure of reinforced concrete (RC) bridge piers and even resulted in overall collapse of bridge structures. For the resistance evaluation of RC components under impact loads, numerical simulations have been performed by adopting different concrete constitutive models and obtained different results, e.g., Karagozian and Case Concrete (KCC) model and Continuous Surface Cap (CSC) model widely used, as well as Kong-Fang (KF) model recently proposed. This study mainly evaluates the accuracy of the above three concrete constitutive models in numerical analyses of vehicular collisions with RC bridge piers. Firstly, basic mechanical behaviors of these models are systematically compared based on single element simulations. Then, the scope of investigation is extended to component level by simulating a drop hammer test on RC beam and a lateral impact test on RC column, and the dynamic behaviors of impacted RC components are deeply compared. Finally, these models are further compared at structure level through performing the refined numerical simulation of a real truck colliding with a prototype bridge and evaluating its global structural behaviors and damage. The results show that, (i) KF model well reflects the post-peak softening behavior, stable strain-rate effect and independence of mesh size of concrete materials under uniaxial loading conditions at different loading rates; KCC and KF models both capture the brittle to ductile transition of concrete materials with increasing confinement pressure; (ii) KF model yields a better prediction in dynamic responses and damage characteristics of impacted RC beam and column, while KCC and CSC models both overestimate the damage degree; (iii) KF model better simulates the shear failure of RC pier in the real accident and provides the reasonable structural dynamic responses, but KCC and CSC models much underestimates the damage degree of impacted bridge pier and adjacent components.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.