Abstract
Experimental studies of the oxygen reduction reaction (ORR) at nitrogen-doped graphene electrodes have reported a remarkably low overpotential, on the order of 0.5 V, similar to Pt-based electrodes. Theoretical calculations using density functional theory have lent support to this claim. However, other measurements have indicated that transition metal impurities are actually responsible for the ORR activity, thereby raising questions about the reliability of both the experiments and the calculations. To assess the accuracy of the theoretical calculations, various generalized gradient approximation (GGA), meta-GGA, and hybrid functionals are employed here and calibrated against high-level wave-function-based coupled-cluster calculations (CCSD(T)) of the overpotential as well as self-interaction corrected density functional calculations and published quantum Monte Carlo calculations of O adatom binding to graphene. The PBE0 and HSE06 hybrid functionals are found to give more accurate results than the GGA and meta-GGA functionals, as would be expected, and for a low dopant concentration, 3.1%, the overpotential is calculated to be 1.0 V. The GGA and meta-GGA functionals give a lower estimate by as much as 0.4 V. When the dopant concentration is doubled, the overpotential calculated with hybrid functionals decreases, while it increases in GGA functional calculations. The opposite trends result from different potential-determining steps, the *OOH species being of central importance in the hybrid functional calculations, while the reduction of *O determines the overpotential obtained in GGA and meta-GGA calculations. The results presented here are mainly based on calculations of periodic representations of the system, but a comparison is also made with molecular flake models that are found to give erratic results due to finite size effects and geometric distortions during energy minimization. The presence of the electrolyte has not been taken into account explicitly in the calculations presented here but is estimated to be important for definitive calculations of the overpotential.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.