Assessment of pacing maneuvers used to validate anterograde accessory pathway potentials.

Abstract

Four pacing maneuvers have been proposed to validate an anterograde accessory pathway potential (APP): (1) atrial pacing to induce complete block between the atrial electrogram and the APP; (2) ventricular pacing to advance the APP without altering the timing of the atrial electrogram; (3) atrial pacing to induce complete block between the APP and the ventricular electrogram; and (4) ventricular pacing to advance the ventricular electrogram without altering the timing of the APP. The purpose of this study was to assess these validation techniques by applying them to electrograms that simulated APPs but which were known to be atrial in origin. In 32 patients undergoing an electrophysiology procedure, a split atrial electrogram containing two components separated by at least 30 msec (mean 54 +/- 15 msec) was recorded. Using an atrial extrastimulus technique, complete block between the two components of the atrial electrogram (criterion 1) could never be induced, but complete block between the second component of the atrial electrogram and the ventricular electrogram (criterion 3) consistently was induced. Using a ventricular extrastimulus technique, the second component of the atrial electrogram consistently could be advanced by 10 to 40 msec without altering the timing of the first component (criterion 2). In addition, with ventricular pacing, the ventricular electrogram consistently was advanced without altering the timing of the two components of the atrial electrogram (criterion 4). In conclusion, among the four pacing maneuvers used to validate an anterograde APP, the only one that may be specific for an APP is the ability to induce complete block between the atrial electrogram and the APP.