Abstract

Although the mechanisms of cocaine reward have been well characterized, the pharmacological basis of cocaine's aversive effects is less understood. Using the conditioned taste aversion (CTA) preparation, the present study examined the role of monoamine uptake inhibition in cocaine's aversive effects by comparing cocaine to three reuptake inhibitors with relative specificity for the transporters of dopamine (DAT; GBR 12909), norepinephrine (NET; desipramine) and serotonin (SERT; clomipramine). Specifically, 104 male Sprague–Dawley rats were given 20-min access to a novel saccharin solution followed immediately by a subcutaneous injection of cocaine, GBR 12909, desipramine, clomipramine (each at 18, 32 or 50 mg/kg; 12 groups) or drug vehicle (equivolume to the highest cocaine dose). Over trials, cocaine and desipramine each dose-dependently suppressed saccharin consumption and did so in an equivalent manner when matched by dose. However, both GBR 12909 and clomipramine conditioned weaker aversions than cocaine at the two lowest doses (18 and 32 mg/kg). At the highest dose (50 mg/kg), GBR 12909 produced equivalent suppression of saccharin consumption to cocaine while clomipramine's conditioned suppression remained relatively weak at this dose. These results suggest that cocaine's adrenergic actions resulting from NET inhibition may play a more significant role in the mediation of its aversive effects than its actions at DAT and SERT.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.