Assessment of gender-specific preventive cardiovascular knowledge among house staff: Potential impact on cardiovascular management

Abstract

Gender differences in cardiovascular prevention and treatment may be related to physicians' level of postgraduate training and gender. This study was designed to assess resident physician knowledge concerning general and gender-specific preventive cardiology topics and to determine whether there were differences in that knowledge based on the physicians' level of postgraduate training or gender. A 29-item true/false questionnaire was administered to residents in a large, university-based internal medicine residency program. All questions were drawn from evidence-based practice guidelines, and a subset of questions pertained to gender-specific issues in cardiovascular disease prevention. Scores on the overall test and gender-specific subset were computed as a percentage of correct answers. Differences were compared by postgraduate year (PGY) of training and physician gender. Of the 190 eligible residents, 159 (88 men, 67 women, 4 not specified) completed the questionnaire. Overall test scores differed significantly by PGY (PGY-1, 83.4% correct answers; PGY-2, 52.9%; PGY-3, 65.3%; P < 0.001 for each paired comparison), but did not differ significantly by physician gender (males, 73.5%; females, 70.0%). Performance on gender-specific items also differed by PGY (PGY-1, 72.2% vs PGY-2, 20.0%; P < 0.001; and PGY-1, 72.2% vs PGY-3, 45.1%; P < 0.001). Knowledge of gender-specific preventive cardiology did not differ significantly by physician gender (males, 56.4%; females, 49.0%). Residents in PGY-1 had better knowledge of preventive cardiology as assessed using this questionnaire than did residents in PGY-2 or PGY-3. Knowledge of general and gender-specific cardiology topics was not related to physician gender.