Abstract

In recent years, Data Warehouses have become essential for researchers and organizations due to their ability to model the near future. For making strategic decisions, the information stored in a data warehouse must be of good quality. The information quality of a data warehouse can be enhanced by determining the data-model quality used for developing the data warehouse. Multidimensional models have been widely accepted as the foundation of data-modeling. Therefore, we believe that improving multi-dimensional model quality could improve the data warehouse quality. Several quality features (such as understandability, simplicity, maintainability, analyzability, coupling, cohesion etc.) have been defined by researchers for measuring the quality of data models. To judge Multidimensional model quality, metrics can be used as they provide a way for evaluating quality in an objective and consistent manner. A few researchers have proposed metrics for the data warehouse multidimensional model. Though, along with the proposal of metrics, they must be validated (theoretically and empirically) to prove their reliability and practical usefulness. This paper focuses on empirical validation of data warehouse logical model metrics using the data-mining machine-learning technique known as decision tree analysis. The results obtained indicate that a few of the proposed metrics are useful in judging the quality of the multidimensional logical model in terms of understandability.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.