Abstract

AbstractBenthic macroinvertebrates are used commonly as water-quality indicators in wadeable streams and rivers. However, increased depth and overall complexity of large rivers may cause inaccessibility or unacceptable index and metric variability when attempting a single wadeable method. Significant increases in sampling effort and time expenditure have been recommended to compensate for the increased variability when assessing large rivers. However, the transition between wadeable streams and nonwadeable rivers is not well defined, especially for free-flowing systems. We evaluated the utility of a modified wadeable-stream collection method for sampling large and complex semiwadeable rivers. Our results suggest that water-quality measurements across the width of a river can be used to identify influences of multiple water sources. This spatial information and a single-habitat (e.g., riffle–run) approach could be used with a modest increase in sampling effort to reduce metric variability and provide impor...

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.