Abstract

There are two major sequencing technologies for investigating the microbiome: the amplicon sequencing that generates the OTU (operational taxonomic unit) tables of marker genes (e.g., bacterial 16S-rRNA), and the metagenomic shotgun sequencing that generates metagenomic gene abundance (MGA) tables. The OTU table is the counterpart of species abundance tables in macrobial ecology of plants and animals, and has been the target of numerous ecological and network analyses in recent gold rush for microbiome research and in great efforts for establishing an inclusive theoretical ecology. Nevertheless, MGA analyses have been largely limited to bioinformatics pipelines and ad hoc statistical methods, and systematic approaches to MGAs guided by classic ecological theories are still few. Here, we argue that, the difference between “gene kinds” and “gene species” are nominal, and the metagenome that a microbiota carries is essentially a ‘community’ of metagenomic genes (MGs). Each row of a MGA table represents a metagenome of a microbiota, and the whole MGA table represents a ‘meta-metagenome’ (or an assemblage of metagenomes) of N microbiotas (microbiome samples). Consequently, the same ecological/network analyses used in OTU analyses should be equally applicable to MGA tables. Here we choose to analyze the heterogeneity of metagenome by introducing classic Taylor’s power law (TPL) and its recent extensions in community ecology. Heterogeneity is a fundamental property of metagenome, particularly in the context of human microbiomes. Recent studies have shown that the heterogeneity of human metagenomes is far more significant than that of human genomes. Therefore, without deep understanding of the human metagenome heterogeneity, personalized medicine of the human microbiome-associated diseases is hardly feasible. The TPL extensions have been successfully applied to measure the heterogeneity of human microbiome based on amplicon-sequencing reads of marker genes (e.g., 16s-rRNA). In this article, we demonstrate the analysis of the metagenomic heterogeneity of human gut microbiome at whole metagenome scale (with type-I power law extension) and metagenomic gene scale (type-III), as well as the heterogeneity of gene clusters, respectively. We further examine the influences of obesity, IBD and diabetes on the heterogeneity, which is of important ramifications for the diagnosis and treatment of human microbiome-associated diseases.

Highlights

  • Understanding the microbiome or “the biome of microbes” usually starts with cataloging the list of OTUs and tabulating their abundance distribution, leading to the so-termed OTU table

  • We first fitted power law extension (PLE)-I with metagenomic gene abundance (MGA) datasets directly in order to measure the metagenome spatial heterogeneity for each treatment of the three datasets, and the results were listed in Table 1, from which we summarize the following findings: (i) PLE-I fitted to all three datasets extremely well with p-value < 0.0001

  • The results for metagenome functional gene clusters (MFGC)-level spatial heterogeneity were listed in Supplementary Table S2 in the online Supplementary Information (OSI), from which we summarize the following findings: (i) The PLE-III model fitted to the MFGC tables extremely significant with p-value < 0.0001 in all three case studies, and this indicates the ubiquitous applicability of the PLE for assessing the spatial heterogeneity of an ‘averaged’ MFGC. (ii) The scaling parameter (b) of the PLE-III model ranged narrowly [1.472, 1.654], and varied little either between the MFGC-I and MFGC-II or between the healthy and diseased treatments within each case study

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Understanding the microbiome or “the biome of microbes” usually starts with cataloging the list of OTUs (operational taxonomic units) and tabulating their abundance distribution, leading to the so-termed OTU table. We propose to introduce Taylor’s power law (Taylor, 1961, 1984, 2007; Taylor and Taylor, 1977; Taylor et al, 1983, 1988) and its recent extensions (Ma, 2015; Oh et al, 2016) to the ecological community, for assessing and interpreting the spatial (or inter-subject) heterogeneity within the metagenome assemblage represented by a MGA table.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.