Abstract

Asphaltene deposition is a common phenomenon during CO2 flooding in ultralow permeability reservoirs. The deposited asphaltene occupies the pore volume and decreases permeability, resulting in serious formation damage and pore well productivity. It is urgent to investigate the asphaltene deposition mechanisms, adverse effects, and preventive measures. However, few asphaltene deposition investigations have been systematically conducted by now. In this research, the asphaltene precipitation mechanisms and adverse effects were comprehensively investigated by using experimental and numerical methods. To study the effects of pressure, asphaltene content, and temperature on asphaltene precipitation qualitatively and quantitatively, the microscope visible detection experiment and the PVT cell static experiment were firstly conducted. The adverse effects on porosity and permeability resulted from asphaltene deposition were also studied by the core flooding experiment. Secondly, simulation models of asphaltene precipitation and deposition were developed and validated by experimental data. Finally, a case study from Changqing oil field was presented to analyze the asphaltene deposition characteristic and preventive measures. The experimental results showed that the asphaltene precipitation increases with the increased pressure before reaching the minimum miscible pressure (MMP) and gets the peak value around the MMP, while decreases slowly. The asphaltene precipitation increases with the increased temperature and asphaltene content. The variation trend of adverse effects on porosity and permeability resulted from asphaltene deposition is similar to that of asphaltene precipitation under the influence of pressure, asphaltene content, and temperature. The case study shows that the water-altering-gas (WAG) with high injection rate suffers more serious asphaltene deposition compared with the WAG with low injection rate, for the asphaltene precipitation increases as the increased pressure before reaching the MMP. The CO2 continuous injection with high injection rate is the worst choice, for low sweep efficiency and the most severe formation damage. Thus, the WAG with optimal injection rate was proposed to maintain well productivity and to reduce formation damage resulted from asphaltene deposition during developing ultralow permeability reservoirs.

Highlights

  • CO2 flooding is a favorable enhanced oil recovery and carbon geosequestration method for reservoirs with ultralow permeability [1,2,3,4,5]

  • The increased asphaltene increases with the increased asphaltene content; this is because the increased asphaltene content increases the asphaltene precipitation possibility

  • (2) The variation trend of adverse effects on porosity and permeability resulted from asphaltene deposition is similar to that of asphaltene precipitation considering the influences of pressure, asphaltene content, and temperature

Read more

Summary

Introduction

CO2 flooding is a favorable enhanced oil recovery and carbon geosequestration method for reservoirs with ultralow permeability [1,2,3,4,5]. Three kinds of experiment were conducted to study the asphaltene precipitation and deposition from different aspects considering the effects of pressure, temperature, and asphaltene content during CO2 flooding. The asphaltene precipitation and deposition reduce pore spaces and narrow seepage throats, which lead to the decreased porosity and permeability, and many models were proposed to describe this phenomenon [43,44,45]. Three kinds of experiments from different aspects were conducted: the asphaltene precipitation microscopic detection experiment, the PVT cell static asphaltene precipitation experiment, and the core flooding dynamic asphaltene deposition experiment These experiments were designed to study the influence of pressure, asphaltene content, and temperature on asphaltene precipitation and deposition from different aspects. Suggestions on how to reduce formation damage caused by asphaltene damage were proposed, which are very useful for engineers to enhance oil recovery

Experiment Study
Simulation Method
Case Study
Summary and Conclusions
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.