Abstract

}This paper’s authors, who are also authors and coordinators of DELR, discuss the etymological treatment of neologisms in Romanian academic dictionaries, with a special emphasis on words starting with the letters A–D. The paper comprises some original etymologies, completing and correcting the solutions previously proposed by DEX and DLR. This endeavour calls for a fresh overview of the main criteria used by lexicographers in scientific etymological research, and for a re-evaluation of several concepts such as multiple etymology or mixed etymology. The paper discusses the origins of 132 words and is organized according to the main criterion that underlay the authors’ option for a certain etymological solution.

Highlights

  • The present paper presents a series of original solutions that correct and complete the etymological treatment of neologisms in Romanian academic dictionaries

  • Etymology is one of the most important aspects of the history of any language, for several reasons: (1). It sheds light on the past and present geographical and cultural contacts that the speakers of a language have had with other languages; (2) it lays the foundation for relevant statistics regarding the number and status of the words that constitute the lexicon of a language; (3) it reveals the tendencies in the evolution of the lexicon, in connection to the integration of a linguistic community in a broader cultural network

  • A word may have been borrowed from two sources, having a multiple external etymology, and at the same time it may have been coined in Romanian, with the same meaning or with a different one

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The present paper presents a series of original solutions that correct and complete the etymological treatment of neologisms in Romanian academic dictionaries. Completing previous etymological explanations is familiar with the form of the word in more than one language (e.g., with a French word and its Latin etymon) This situation usually occurs with international words and is favoured by the coexistence of multiple cultural influences over a certain period or a certain area, or by the multilingual profile of a certain author[6 ]. A word may have been borrowed from two sources, having a multiple external etymology, and at the same time it may have been coined in Romanian, with the same meaning or with a different one Such is the case of the noun aristocratism ‘aristocratic attitude’, attested in the mid-19th century The full reference of these sources can be found in the bibliography published in delr, 2nd volume, 2nd part

The formal criterion
Identifying direct etymons formally closer to the Romanian words
POS identity
Correcting the form of the etymon
Etymons explaining just one variant
Word formation vs borrowing11
The semantics of the etymon
The semantic criterion as an argument against derivation in Romanian
The semantic criterion as an argument for derivation in Romanian
The chronological criterion
The etymon frequency criterion
The concept history criterion
Words for which no etymon has been proposed before
Conclusions
Fascicula I
Books and articles
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.