Artroskopik Omuz Cerrahisinde Pnömotoraks: Çok Faktörlü Risk Analizi ve Olgu Sunumu

ESRA19-0518 Strategies to reduce hemidiaphragmatic paresis and related risks after blocks/for shoulder surgery

Background:The shoulder area is mainly innervated with the C5 and C6 nerve roots, and interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is widely used for postoperative analgesia after shoulder surgery. However, it is associated with adverse effects, such as numbness and weakness in the blocked arm due to an unwanted block of the lower brachial plexus (C7-T1). We hypothesized that the C5 approach during ISB would provide postoperative analgesia while minimizing adverse events after arthroscopic shoulder surgery.Methods:A total of 92 patients scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery were enrolled and randomly assigned to 1 of the 3 groups: The control (no ISB, n = 31), conventional ISB (ISB with the conventional approach, n = 31), or C5 ISB (ISB with the C5 approach, n = 30) group. ISB was performed before the induction of anesthesia, and a subacromial catheter was placed in all patients at the end of the surgery. Postoperative pain scores, numbness, and weakness were recorded at 2, 8, and 24 hours after surgery. Oxygen saturation and overall patient satisfaction scores were also assessed at 1 and 48 hour after surgery, respectively.Results:The pain scores were lower in the conventional ISB group and the C5 ISB group than in the control group at postoperative 2 and 8 hours (P < 0.05). The incidence and degree of numbness and weakness of the blocked arm were significantly lower in the C5 ISB group than in the conventional ISB group (P < 0.05). Oxygen saturation were lower in the conventional ISB group and C5 ISB group than in the control group (P = 0.01). Overall patient satisfaction scores were higher in the C5 ISB group than in the control or conventional ISB group (P < 0.01).Conclusion:The C5 approach for ISB provides analgesia as effectively as the conventional approach following arthroscopic shoulder surgery, with the advantages of minimal numbness and weakness.

Fasten your seatbelts: innovation in regional anaesthesia is a bumpy ride.

This systematic review aimed to compare the analgesic effectiveness and complications rates for anterior suprascapular nerve blocks (ASSB) compared to interscalene brachial plexus blocks (ISB) for arthroscopic and outpatient shoulder surgery. Only randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing the ASSB versus ISB in the context of arthroscopic shoulder surgery were eligible for inclusion. The primary outcomes included pain scores (Numeric Rating Scale of 0 to 10) up to 24h postoperatively and analgesic consumption. Secondary outcomes included block complications. Meta-analysis was performed using random-effects modeling and result certainty was determined using the GRADEpro tool. Six RCTs (709 patients) were included for analysis. ISB displayed a statistically significant reduction in pain scores by 0.40 (95%CI = 0.36 to 0.45; p < 0.00001) but not morphine equivalent consumption (mean difference = 0.74mg; 95%CI = -0.18 to 1.66mg; I2 = 60%; p = 0.11; moderate certainty) immediately in the postoperative care unit. Opioid consumption and pain scores at 6 to 24h were not significantly different. There was no difference in respiratory events postblock. ASSB demonstrated a significantly lower incidence of Horner's syndrome (relative risk (RR) = 0.17; 95%CI = 0.08 to 0.39; p < 0.00001; high certainty), voice hoarseness (RR = 0.24; 95%CI = 0.10 to 0.57; p < 0.00001; high certainty) and impaired respiratory function (p < 0.00001). The ASSB could be considered an appropriate analgesic option for arthroscopic shoulder surgery with potentially fewer complications than the ISB.

Arthroscopic shoulder surgery can be performed with an interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBPB) alone, ISBPB combined with general anesthesia (GA), or GA alone. Postoperative pain is typically managed with opioids; however, both GA and opioids have adverse effects which can delay discharge. This retrospective study compares the efficacy of four methods of anesthesia management for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. Charts of all patients who underwent shoulder surgery by a single surgeon from 2012-2015 were categorized by analgesic regimen: GA only (n=177), single-shot ISBPB only (n=124), or pre- vs postoperative ISBPB combined with GA (ISBPB+GA [n=72] vs GA+ISBPB [n=52], respectively). The primary outcome measure was the time to discharge from the postanesthesia care unit (PACU). Mean (SD) time in the PACU ranged from 70.5 (39.9) min for ISBPB only to 111.2 (56.9) min for GA only. Use of ISBPB in any combination and regardless of timing resulted in significantly reduced PACU time, with a mean drop of 27.2 min (95% confidence interval [CI], 17.3 to 37.2; P<0.001). The largest mean pairwise difference was between GA only and ISBPB only, with a mean difference of 40.7 min (95% CI, 25.5 to 55.8; P<0.001). Use of ISBPB also reduced pain upon arrival at the PACU and, in some cases, upon discharge from the PACU (i.e., ISBPB only but not ISBPB+GA compared with GA). An ISBPB (alone or prior to GA) also reduced analgesic requirements. Previously reported benefits of an ISBPB for arthroscopic shoulder surgery are confirmed. Postoperative ISBPBs may also be beneficial for reducing pain and opioid requirements and could be targeted for patients in severe pain upon emergence. A sufficiently powered randomized-controlled trial could determine the relative efficacy, safety, and associated financial implications associated with each method.

The interscalene brachial plexus block (ISBB) is an effective procedure for minimizing postoperative opioid consumption and pain following arthroscopic shoulder surgery. The ultrasound (US)-guided supraclavicular brachial plexus block (SCBB) seems to be an alternative technique for arthroscopic shoulder surgery. However, evidence is lacking regarding the impact of SCBB on postoperative pain management and recovery after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. The aim of this study was to compare the effects of SCBB with ISBB in terms of postoperative pain and quality of recovery after arthroscopic shoulder surgery. A total of 62 adult patients scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia were randomized into 2 groups to receive either ISBB (IB group, n=31) or SCBB (SB group, n=29) with 20mL of 0.25% bupivacaine under US guidance. Assessments included postoperative pain scores, additional analgesic requirement, timing of the first analgesic requirement, Quality of Recovery-40 (QoR-40) scores, block characteristics, and side effects. No significant differences were found between the 2 groups for pain scores (P=0.34), timing of first analgesic requirement (P=0.30), additional analgesic requirement (P=0.34), or QoR-40 scores (P=0.13). The block characteristics regarding procedure time (P=0.95), block failure, and onset time of sensory blockade (P=0.33) were similar. Horner's syndrome occurred in 8 patients in the IB group and 1 patient in the SB group (P=0.015). This study showed that US-guided SCBB is as effective as ISBB in reducing postoperative pain and improving the quality of recovery for arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Ability to Return to Play After Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery in Professional Female Tennis Players

Perioperative ulnar neuropathy following shoulder surgery under combined interscalene brachial plexus block and general anaesthesia

ESRA19-0496 Influence of hypotension to the brain oxygenation during shoulder arthroscopy in sitting position

Patient Perceptions of Open and Arthroscopic Shoulder Surgery

BackgroundAlthough arthroscopic shoulder surgery is less invasive and painful than open shoulder surgery, it can often cause intra-operative hemodynamic instability and severe post-operative pain. This study was conducted to investigate the efficacy of the interscalene brachial plexus block (IBPB) on intra-operative hemodynamic changes and post-operative pain during arthroscopic shoulder surgery.MethodsAfter institutional review board approval, 50 consecutive patients that had undergone arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia were randomly assigned to one of two groups to evaluate intra-operative hemodynamic changes and post-operative pain control. Group 1 patients received an IBPB with 10 ml of normal saline guided by a nerve stimulator before induction, and Group 2 patients received 10 ml of 0.5% ropivacaine hydrochloride with the same technique. The heart rate and systolic and diastolic blood pressures were recorded before the incision and 1, 3, 5, 10, and 20 minutes after the incision. Pre-operative and post-operative pain was evaluated with a visual analog scale 1, 3, 6, 12, and 24 hours after surgery. The patients were given tramadol as a rescue medication option. The total volume of tramadol that was injected was also evaluated over the same intervals.ResultsGroup 2 showed significantly lower systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rates intra-operatively compared to Group 1 (P < 0.05). The visual analog scale pain scores, except at 24 hours after surgery, were significantly lower in Group 2 (P < 0.05). The total tramadol consumption significantly reduced in Group 2 (P < 0.05).ConclusionsIBPB effectively controlled the hemodynamic changes that occurred during arthroscopic shoulder surgery as well as post-operative pain.

Introduction: Management of intraoperative hemodynamics and postoperative analgesia during arthroscopic shoulder surgeries remains a challenge. Although interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) is considered ideal for shoulder anesthesia it requires skill and proficiency unlike intravenous (IV) dexmedetomidine. Objective: This randomized trial was performed to observe the efficacy of dexmedetomidine infusion which is less invasive and demands lesser skills than plexus block. Methodology: All patients scheduled for elective arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia were assigned either to group DEX, which received an IV dexmedetomidine bolus of 0.5 mcg/kg over 20 minutes, followed by an infusion of 0.5 mcg/kg/hour that was stopped 30 minutes before surgery the end of surgery or to group BLOCK which received ultrasound guided ISB with 20ml of 0.25% bupivacaine. The primary outcome assessed was intraoperative hemodynamics; the secondary outcomes were immediate postoperative pain, operating condition as assessed by the surgeon, recovery time, and patient satisfaction after 24 hours. Blinded investigator and composite scores were used for the assessment. Results: Both groups displayed equivalent scores for intraoperative hemodynamics whereas ISB resulted in a better post-operative analgesia (p &lt; 0.001). Surgeon’s opinion and recovery time were comparable. Overall, the patients had a satisfactory experience with both techniques, according to the quality assessment. Conclusion: IV dexmedetomidine infusion is an effective alternative to ISB for reconstructive shoulder surgeries under general anesthesia.

BackgroundHypothermia is common during arthroscopic shoulder surgery under general anesthesia, and anesthetic-impaired thermoregulation is thought to be the major cause of hypothermia. This prospective, randomized, double-blind study was designed to compare perioperative temperature during arthroscopic shoulder surgery with interscalene brachial plexus block (IBPB) followed by general anesthesia vs. general anesthesia alone.MethodsPatients scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery were randomly allocated to receive IBPB followed by general anesthesia (group GB, n = 20) or general anesthesia alone (group GO, n = 20), and intraoperative and postoperative body temperatures were measured.ResultsThe initial body temperatures were 36.5 ± 0.3℃ vs. 36.4 ± 0.4℃ in group GB vs. GO, respectively (P = 0.215). The body temperature at 120 minutes after induction of anesthesia was significantly higher in group GB than in group GO (35.8 ± 0.3℃ vs. 34.9 ± 0.3℃; P < 0.001). The body temperatures at 60 minutes after admission to the post-anesthesia care unit were 35.8 ± 0.3℃ vs. 35.2 ± 0.2℃ in group GB vs. GO, respectively (P < 0.001). The concentrations of desflurane at 0, 15, and 120 minutes after induction of anesthesia were 6.0 vs. 6.0% (P = 0.330), 5.0 ± 0.8% vs. 5.8 ± 0.4% (P = 0.001), and 3.4 ± 0.4% vs. 7.1 ± 0.9% (P < 0.001) in group GB vs. GO, respectively.ConclusionsThe present study demonstrated that preoperative IBPB could reduce both the intraoperative concentration of desflurane and the reduction in body temperature during and after arthroscopic shoulder surgery.

Background: Interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) combined with conscious sedation is a viable alternative to general anaesthesia for arthroscopic shoulder surgery in the beach chair position. The purpose of the trial was to compare the haemodynamic instability and safety of Dexmedetomidine vs Propofol for conscious sedation in arthroscopic shoulder surgery in the beach chair position. Method: A single-blinded prospective randomized trial was conducted in 56 patients randomly allocated into Dexmedetomidine and Propofol groups for conscious sedation following ISB placement. The primary outcome was to measure intraoperative haemodynamic variations (systolic blood pressure, mean arterial pressure, heart rate) in the two groups maintaining adequate conscious sedation during arthroscopic shoulder surgery in the beach chair position. Results: In the dexmedetomidine group a significantly higher percentage of systolic blood pressure (21.86 𝑣𝑠 10.81%, p = 0.001, 𝑑 = 1.05) and a higher percentage heart rate (18.52 vs 9.02%, p = 0.002, 𝑑 = .98) drop from baseline measurements was noted. A large (d ≥ 0.8) Cohen’s effect size suggested the high practical significance of the finding. Perioperative hypotensive (f=19, p&lt;0.001) and bradycardic (f=21, p=0.003) episodes were significantly more frequent in the dexmedetomidine group. The propofol group had a greater incidence of airway complications requiring intervention (f=6 vs f=0, p=.023). Conclusion: Dexmedetomidine leads to significant blood pressure and heart rate reductions from baseline values in the beach chair position providing controlled hypotension and has minimal airway complications in patients undergoing arthroscopic shoulder surgery in the beach chair position under ISB and conscious sedation compared to Propofol.

Arthroscopic shoulder surgery is often associated with severe postoperative pain. The results concerning subacromial bursa blockade (SUB) as a method of pain relief have been contradictory. We hypothesized that a SUB and interscalene brachial plexus block (ISB) would similarly reduce early postoperative pain and the need for oxycodone as compared to placebo (PLA). Forty-five patients scheduled for arthroscopic shoulder surgery were enrolled in this randomised, prospective study. The ISB and SUB blockades were performed with 15 ml of ropivacaine (5 mg/ml). In the PLA group, 15 ml of 0.9% saline was injected into the subacromial bursa. All patients received general anaesthesia. The mean intravenously patient-controlled delivered oxycodone consumption during the first 6 h was significantly lower in the ISB group (6 mg) than in the SUB group (24.1 mg; P=0.001) or in the PLA group (27 mg; P<0.001). No significant differences were detected between the SUB and PLA groups (P=0.791). The postoperative pain scores during the first 4 h at rest and during the first 6 h on movement were significantly lower in the ISB group than in the SUB and PLA groups. After arthroscopic shoulder surgery SUB has a minor effect only on postoperative analgesia, whereas an ISB with low-dose ropivacaine effectively relieves early postoperative pain and reduces the need for opioids.