Abstract
While art is omnipresent in human history, the neural mechanisms of how we perceive, value and differentiate art has only begun to be explored. Functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) studies suggested that art acts as secondary reward, involving brain activity in the ventral striatum and prefrontal cortices similar to primary rewards such as food. However, potential similarities or unique characteristics of art-related neuroscience (or neuroesthetics) remain elusive, also because of a lack of adequate experimental tools: the available collections of art stimuli often lack standard image definitions and normative ratings. Therefore, we here provide a large set of well-characterized, novel art images for use as visual stimuli in psychological and neuroimaging research. The stimuli were created using a deep learning algorithm that applied different styles of popular paintings (based on artists such as Klimt or Hundertwasser) on ordinary animal, plant and object images which were drawn from established visual stimuli databases. The novel stimuli represent mundane items with artistic properties with proposed reduced dimensionality and complexity compared to paintings. In total, 2,332 novel stimuli are available open access as “art.pics” database at https://osf.io/BTWNQ/ with standard image characteristics that are comparable to other common visual stimuli material in terms of size, variable color distribution, complexity, intensity and valence, measured by image software analysis and by ratings derived from a human experimental validation study [n = 1,296 (684f), age 30.2 ± 8.8 y.o.]. The experimental validation study further showed that the art.pics elicit a broad and significantly different variation in subjective value ratings (i.e., liking and wanting) as well as in recognizability, arousal and valence across different art styles and categories. Researchers are encouraged to study the perception, processing and valuation of art images based on the art.pics database which also enables real reward remuneration of the rated stimuli (as art prints) and a direct comparison to other rewards from e.g., food or money.Key Messages: We provide an open access, validated and large set of novel stimuli (n = 2,332) of standardized art images including normative rating data to be used for experimental research. Reward remuneration in experimental settings can be easily implemented for the art.pics by e.g., handing out the stimuli to the participants (as print on premium paper or in a digital format), as done in the presented validation task. Experimental validation showed that the art.pics’ images elicit a broad and significantly different variation in subjective value ratings (i.e., liking, wanting) across different art styles and categories, while size, color and complexity characteristics remained comparable to other visual stimuli databases.
Highlights
Human behavior relies on subjective values, emerging from physiological and cultural needs such as food, money and art
While primary rewards are evolutionary imprints and hardly learnable, humans learn throughout life to derive pleasure from secondary rewards such as art
For esthetic pleasure there seem to be distinct characteristics compared to appetitive pleasures: esthetics commonly rely on complex mechanisms that are associated with a mixture of emotions unlike appetitive liking, and, as art is not an instinct, esthetics highly depends on individual experience and knowledge based on esthetic encounters (Chatterjee, 2014)
Summary
Human behavior relies on subjective values, emerging from physiological and cultural needs such as food, money and art. The underlying neurobiology of how we perceive, process and differentiate a certain value that is elicited by an external stimulus is far from fully understood, especially with regard to art (Chatterjee, 2011). Rewards can be hierarchically clustered into primary (water, food, and sex) and secondary rewards (money, social cues, esthetics, and engaging activities), with potentially different processing signatures in the brain. While primary rewards are evolutionary imprints and hardly learnable, humans learn throughout life to derive pleasure from secondary rewards such as art (for a detailed discussion, see The Esthetic Brain by Chatterjee, 2014). The subjective value of a certain stimulus is reflected by its “liking” and/or “wanting,” two different concepts that likely involve different brain mechanisms. For esthetic pleasure there seem to be distinct characteristics compared to appetitive pleasures: esthetics commonly rely on complex mechanisms that are associated with a mixture of emotions unlike appetitive liking, and, as art is not an instinct, esthetics highly depends on individual experience and knowledge based on esthetic encounters (Chatterjee, 2014)
Full Text
Topics from this Paper
Standard Image
Set Of Novel Stimuli
Art Styles
Art Images
Experimental Validation Study
+ Show 5 more
Create a personalized feed of these topics
Get StartedTalk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
NeuroImage
Mar 1, 2011
The Analysis of Verbal Behavior
Sep 11, 2014
Journal of Eye Movement Research
Jun 9, 2020
Spatial Vision
Jan 1, 2008
Jan 1, 2020
Sep 1, 2020
Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition
Sep 1, 2021
European Journal of Neuroscience
Oct 1, 2003
Journal of Curriculum and Teaching
Dec 22, 2022
Культура и искусство
Jan 1, 2023
Sep 7, 2016
arXiv: Information Retrieval
Jul 15, 2016
Alzheimer's & Dementia
Jul 1, 2011
Wireless Communications and Mobile Computing
Feb 23, 2022
Frontiers in Psychology
Frontiers in Psychology
Nov 27, 2023
Frontiers in Psychology
Nov 27, 2023
Frontiers in Psychology
Nov 27, 2023
Frontiers in Psychology
Nov 27, 2023
Frontiers in Psychology
Nov 27, 2023
Frontiers in Psychology
Nov 27, 2023
Frontiers in Psychology
Nov 27, 2023
Frontiers in Psychology
Nov 27, 2023
Frontiers in Psychology
Nov 27, 2023
Frontiers in Psychology
Nov 27, 2023