Abstract
Various artificial dissipation models that are used with central difference algorithms for the Euler equations are analyzed for their effect on accuracy, stability, and convergence rates. In particular, linear and nonlinear models are investigated using an implicit approximate factorization code (ARC2D) for transonic airfoils. Fully implicit application of the dissipation models is shown to improve robustness and convergence rates. The treatment of dissipation models at boundaries will be examined. It will be shown that accurate, error free solutions with sharp shocks can be obtained using a central difference algorithm coupled with an appropriate nonlinear artificial dissipation model. I. Introduction T HE solution of the Euler equations using numerical techniques requires the use of either a differencing method with inherent dissipation or the addition of dissipation terms to a nondissipative scheme. This is because the Euler equations do not provide any natural dissipation mechanism (such as viscosity in the Navier-Stokes equations) that would eliminate high frequencies which are caused by nonlinearitie s and especially shocks. A variety of numerical algorithms and computer codes for the Euler equations have been developed. Methods such as MacCormack's1 explicit
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.