Arthroscopy or arthrotomy for native knee septic arthritis: A systematic review

Abstract

AbstractPurposeSeptic arthritis of any joint is an orthopaedic emergency which requires prompt diagnosis and treatment. The knee is the commonest joint afflicted, and the primary objective of any treatment is complete source control. This commonly takes the form of antibiotic therapy and a washout of the infected joint by means of arthroscopy or arthrotomy. The primary aim of this review is to investigate if arthroscopic washout for native knee septic arthritis confers a lower risk of repeat procedure than arthrotomy.MethodsA systematic review and meta‐analysis was conducted of the MEDLINE, SCOPUS and the Cochrane Library data bases. The primary outcome of interest was requirement for repeat washout with all‐cause complications, length of inpatient stay and mortality secondary outcomes.ResultsA total of 17,140 subjects were included for analysis of the primary outcome, and the overall rate of repeat procedure was 14.6%. No statistical difference was found between arthroscopy and arthrotomy for repeat washout (risk ratio 0.86 [95% confidence interval, CI: 0.72–1.02], I2 = 36%). Eligible studies found in favour of arthroscopy for all‐cause complication rate (risk ratio 0.75 [95% CI: 0.6–0.93], I2 = 84%) and length of stay in hospital (mean difference −1.98 days [95% CI: −3.43 to −0.53], I2 = 84%). No statistical difference was found for the mortality rate (risk ratio 1.17 [95% CI: 0.52–2.63], I2 = 57%).ConclusionOur analysis found arthroscopy and open arthrotomy to be equivocal for repeat surgical washout in native knee septic arthritis. All‐cause complication rate and length of inpatient stay were favourable for arthroscopy with no difference noted between mortality rates.Level of EvidenceLevel III.