Abstract
David Furley has recently argued that regular rainfall in the Aristotelian world is teleological.' Furley demonstrates the failure of all attempts to exclude winter rain from the scope of Aristotle's apparently exclusive disjunction coincidence or for the sake of something (198b34-199a8).2 It is clear that Furley ascribes regular rain to purpose, and that that purpose is crop growth; but his further commitment to cosmic teleology in Aristotle remains obscure.3 David Sedley displays no such reticence.4 Starting from the presumption that Aristotle's teleology is interactive or global,5
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callSimilar Papers
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
