Are all truths maximally risky?
Abstract According to the modal account, risk is a function of modal closeness. A puzzling consequence of this account is that all truths are maximally risky. I defend this puzzling claim against several objections found in the literature, by drawing connections between axiom T for safety and risk and between counterfactual reasoning and risk. I conclude by briefly explaining why we find the conclusion puzzling and by advocating for a pluralist notion of risk where modal risk is a legitimate notion alongside the probabilistic one.
- Research Article
- 10.1093/analys/anaf080
- Nov 18, 2025
- Analysis
- Research Article
- 10.1093/analys/anaf083
- Nov 12, 2025
- Analysis
- Research Article
- 10.1093/analys/anaf092
- Nov 6, 2025
- Analysis
- Research Article
- 10.1093/analys/anaf093
- Nov 6, 2025
- Analysis
- Addendum
- 10.1093/analys/anaf079
- Nov 4, 2025
- Analysis
- Research Article
- 10.1515/anly-2025-0066
- Oct 28, 2025
- Analysis
- Research Article
- 10.1093/analys/anaf086
- Oct 8, 2025
- Analysis
- Research Article
- 10.1093/analys/anaf076
- Oct 8, 2025
- Analysis
- Research Article
- 10.1093/analys/anaf085
- Oct 8, 2025
- Analysis
- Research Article
- 10.1093/analys/anaf056
- Oct 6, 2025
- Analysis
- Ask R Discovery
- Chat PDF
AI summaries and top papers from 250M+ research sources.