Abstract
Despite different perceptions, discourses and approaches, the post-Cold War Arctic is with a high geopolitical stability based on institutional, international cooperation started by the Arctic states and supported by Arctic indigenous peoples, non- governmental organizations and sub-national governments. As a result, there are neither armed conflicts nor serious disputes on national borders. Behind the high geopolitical stability are on the one hand, common interests of the Arctic states to decrease military tension and increase political stability by causing a transformation from confrontation to environmental cooperation. On the other hand, there are certain features of Arctic geopolitics as prerequisites for a transformation, such as firm state sovereignty, high degree of legal certainty, and flexibility in agenda setting. When assessing a state of Arctic geopolitics and IR of the post-Cold War era, there is an ambivalence on how ‘geopolitics’ is defined. Behind are the dualism of military presence based on the nuclear weapons’ systems and the high stability based on international, institutional cooperation between the eight Arctic states. As well as, that there are two major competing discourses: first, the Arctic as a ’zone of peace’ and exceptional in world politics, and second, that there is a race of resources and the consequent emerging conflicts in theArctic. In addition, there are fresh reminders that Arctic geopolitics is impacted by (grand) environmental challenges and ‘wicked problems’, in particular climate change; and that new multi- dimensional dynamics has made Arctic geopolitics global. The article aims to draw up a holistic picture of the post-Cold War Arctic, and discuss what might be special features of Arctic geopolitics in globalization. The article examines and discusses the transformation of approach from classical geopolitics to critical geopolitics by applying main approaches of geopolitics to the Arctic/Arctic geopolitics.
Highlights
The ultimate aim, or ‘arts’, of ‘Politics’ is said to make possible to happen
Discourses and approaches, the post-Cold War Arctic is with a high geopolitical stability based on institutional, international cooperation started by the Arctic states and supported by Arctic non-state actors, such as Arctic indigenous peoples, non-governmental organizations and sub-national governments
Behind the high geopolitical stability are on the one hand, common interests of the Arctic states to decrease military tension and increase political stability by causing a transformation from the confrontation of the Cold War period to functional environmental cooperation, and on the other hand, certain features of Arctic geopolitics as prerequisites for a transformation
Summary
The ultimate aim, or ‘arts’, of ‘Politics’ is said to make possible to happen. This requires contest and (political) fight, which is done through, and by, a speech act and rhetoric. They, as well as texts, construct geopolitics, too (Moisio 2003). The phrase to call the Arctic as a “zone of peace” by President Mikhail Gorbachev (1987) has influenced the reality and Arctic geopolitics. There are other visions or perceptions concerning of the Arctic region, such as “Homeland”, “Land of discovery”, “Storehouse of resources”, “Theater for military”, “Environmental linchpin”, “Scientific Arctic” by the Arctic Human Development Report (AHDR 2004). Statements like “What happens in the Arctic, doesn’t stay there!”, indicate, even manifest, that the Arctic is been globalized (Heininen and Finger, 2017), and the global Arctic has become a barometer for global environmental and climate change
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
