Abstract
Observing that many application programs from different domains can live with less-than-perfect accuracy, existing techniques try to trade off program output accuracy with performance-energy savings. While these works provide point solutions, they leave three critical questions regarding approximate computing unanswered: (i) what is the maximum potential of skipping (i.e., not performing) data accesses under a given inaccuracy bound?; (ii) can we identify the data accesses to drop randomly, or is being architecture aware critical?; and (iii) do two executions that skip the same number of data accesses always result in the same output quality (error)? This paper first provides answers to these questions using ten multithreaded workloads, and then presents a program slicing-based approach that identifies the set of data accesses to drop. Results indicate 8.8% performance improvement and 13.7% energy saving are possible when we set the error bound to 2%, and the corresponding improvements jump to 15% and 25%, respectively, when the error bound is raised to 4%.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
