Abstract

MEPS Marine Ecology Progress Series Contact the journal Facebook Twitter RSS Mailing List Subscribe to our mailing list via Mailchimp HomeLatest VolumeAbout the JournalEditorsTheme Sections MEPS 352:299-309 (2007) - DOI: https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07076 Aquatic bird disease and mortality as an indicator of changing ecosystem health Scott H. Newman1, 2, 4, 5,*, Aleksei Chmura2, Kathy Converse3, A. Marm Kilpatrick2, Nikkita Patel2, Emily Lammers1, Peter Daszak2 1Wildlife Trust, 460 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10001, USA 2Consortium for Conservation Medicine, 460 West 34th Street, New York, New York 10001, USA 3USGS National Wildlife Health Center, 6006 Schroeder Road, Madison, Wisconsin 53711, USA 4Present address: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAO), Infectious Disease Group, Emergency Centre for Transboundary Animal Diseases (ECTAD), Animal Health Service, Viale delle Terme di Caracalla, Rome 00100, Italy 5Present address: Wildlife Conservation Society, Field Veterinary Program, 2300 Southern Boulevard, Bronx, New York 10460, USA *Email: scott.newman@fao.org ABSTRACT: We analyzed data from pathologic investigations in the United States, collected by the USGS National Wildlife Health Center between 1971 and 2005, into aquatic bird mortality events. A total of 3619 mortality events was documented for aquatic birds, involving at least 633 708 dead birds from 158 species belonging to 23 families. Environmental causes accounted for the largest proportion of mortality events (1737 or 48%) and dead birds (437 258 or 69%); these numbers increased between 1971 and 2000, with biotoxin mortalities due to botulinum intoxication (Types C and E) being the leading cause of death. Infectious diseases were the second leading cause of mortality events (20%) and dead birds (20%), with both viral diseases, including duck plague (Herpes virus), paramyxovirus of cormorants (Paramyxovirus PMV1) and West Nile virus (Flavivirus), and bacterial diseases, including avian cholera (Pasteurella multocida), chlamydiosis (Chalmydia psittici), and salmonellosis (Salmonella sp.), contributing. Pelagic, coastal marine birds and species that use marine and freshwater habitats were impacted most frequently by environmental causes of death, with biotoxin exposure, primarily botulinum toxin, resulting in mortalities of both coastal and freshwater species. Pelagic birds were impacted most severely by emaciation and starvation, which may reflect increased anthropogenic pressure on the marine habitat from over-fishing, pollution, and other factors. Our study provides important information on broad trends in aquatic bird mortality and highlights how long-term wildlife disease studies can be used to identify anthropogenic threats to wildlife conservation and ecosystem health. In particular, mortality data for the past 30 yr suggest that biotoxins, viral, and bacterial diseases could have impacted >5 million aquatic birds. KEY WORDS: Emerging infectious diseases · Aquatic birds · Seabirds · Ecosystem · Health · Bird mortality · Sentinel species · Conservation medicine · Botulism · Viral disease · Bacterial disease Full text in pdf format Supplementary appendix PreviousCite this article as: Newman SH, Chmura A, Converse K, Kilpatrick AM, Patel N, Lammers E, Daszak P (2007) Aquatic bird disease and mortality as an indicator of changing ecosystem health. Mar Ecol Prog Ser 352:299-309. https://doi.org/10.3354/meps07076Export citation RSS - Facebook - Tweet - linkedIn Cited by Published in MEPS Vol. 352. Online publication date: December 20, 2007 Print ISSN: 0171-8630; Online ISSN: 1616-1599 Copyright © 2007 Inter-Research.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.