Abstract

Chapters 6, 8, 9 and 14 of the so called Paradoxographus Palatinus (PP) have posed problems to editors, as they contain toponyms considered corrupt. Based on some considerations set out in a previous article on the PP, a solution to those problems is here proposed, highlighting the existence of the places named and the reality of the phenomena described in the chapters, as well as the lack of any textual relation with other loci in Greek. As a consequence of this, the confirmation of the manuscript readings and the possibility that the chapters may be the excerptor’s creation are suggested.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.