Abstract
SUMMARY In order to assess the effect of different approximations involved in the computation of molecular polarization potential maps, two sources of inaccuracies were analysed in the present work. First, the effect of non-linear contributions of the electric field, and second the effect of using an uncoupled Hartree‐Fock perturbation scheme for its evaluation. The study was carried out at the Hartree‐Fock level using the standard basis sets: 3‐21G, 6‐31G and 6‐31G* on six different molecules: hydrogen cyanide, formaldehyde, urea, acetone, furan and pyrrole. The results show that non-linear effects can be up to 4% of the total polarization when a unit charge is used for the computation of the polarization maps. Regarding the use of an approximate treatment for the calculation of the perturbation energy, the study reflects that the average underestimation of the polarization potential provided by the uncoupled scheme ranges from 4 to 15% depending on the system considered.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
