Abstract
Presents the results of testing the methodology for determining the passenger's travel time according to the "door-to-door" scheme on intra-city and suburban routes using hovercrafts. The introduction presents the results of the analysis of a number of research works of domestic and foreign scientists in the field of passenger transportation by hovercraft. The analysis showed that studies of passenger travel taking into account such factors as distance and time according to the "door-to-door" scheme on intra-city and suburban routes in riverine regions by buses and hovercraft do not occur, which means that the chosen research topic is relevant. The methods section summarizes the basics of calculations and initial data for testing the methodology for determining the time spent by passengers on a trip using a hovercraft. The results section provides graphical data as a result of testing the methodology. The opinion of the authors of the article on the use of alternative travel options by a passenger on intra-city and suburban routes by road and (or) river transport is put up for discussion. In the final part of the article, it is determined that this method of determining the travel time of a passenger on intra-city, and in comparison, may be of interest both for passengers and transport organizations.
Highlights
The results of testing the methodology of determining the passenger's travel time by "door-to-door" scheme on inner-city and suburban routes using hovercrafts are presented in the article
The analysis showed that there have been no studies of passenger travel based on such factors as distance and time by "door-to-door" scheme on intra-city and suburban routes by buses and a hovercraft in riverine regions, which means that the chosen research topic is relevant
Girdher R.K., Lewis D.E. Hovercraft: a bibliography: Hovering Craft and Hydrofoil12(1), 33–40 (1972)
Summary
Представленное в таблицах 1 и 2, позволяет нам построить соответствующие графики сравнения и увидеть развернутую динамику (см. рис. 1). 2. Сравнительная динамика времени поездки пассажира по внутригородскому маршруту на двух автобусах (схема 2) и на судне на воздушной подушке с приездом пассажира на речной причал на одном автобусе (схема 2, речная) Fig. 2. 3. Динамика продолжительности поездки пассажира по пригородному маршруту на одном автобусе (до 150 км пути) и в судне на воздушной подушке, когда пассажир своим ходом приходит на речной причал (соответственно схема 4 и схема 1, речная). 4. Динамика продолжительности поездки пассажира по пригородному маршруту с использованием одного городского автобуса для поездки до автостанции и до речного пункта посадке на СВП (соответственно схема 5 и схема 2 речная) Fig. 4. 5. Динамика продолжительности поездки пассажира по пригородному маршруту с использованием двух городских и одного пригородного автобуса и судна на воздушной подушке с приездом пассажира на речной причал одним городским автобусом на расстоянии 30 км (соответственно схема 5 и схема 3, речная) Fig. 5. Это показано на примере формирования возможных внутригородских и пригородных линий Нижегородского транспортного узла, представленных в таблице 3
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
