Aortic Valve Replacement in Octogenarians: Is Biologic Valve the Unique Solution?

Abstract

This study analyzed morbidity, mortality, and quality of life after aortic valve replacement with mechanical and biologic prostheses in octogenarian patients. A retrospective analysis was performed in 345 consecutive patients, mean age of 82 +/- 2 years (range, 80 to 92), who had aortic valve replacement from May 1991 to April 2005. A bioprosthesis (group I) was used in 200 patients (58%), and 145 (42%) received a mechanical prosthesis (group II). Associated cardiac procedures were done in 211 patients (61%), of which 71% were coronary artery bypass grafting. Patients had symptomatic aortic stenosis (84.3%) or associated aortic insufficiency; 88% were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III or IV. The mean preoperative aortic valve gradient was 62 +/- 16 mm Hg (range, 25 to 122 mm Hg). The mean left ventricular ejection fraction was good (0.52 +/- 0.12); 30 patients (8.7%) had an ejection fraction of less than 0.30. The in-hospital mortality rate was 7.5% (26 patients); 17 (8.5%) in group I and 9 (6.2%) in group II (p = 0.536) Significant predictors of operative mortality were preoperative renal insufficiency (blood creatinine > 2.00 mg/mL) and need for urgent operation. Mean follow-up, complete at 100%, was 40 +/- 33 months (range, 1 to 176 months). Long-term follow-up, using Kaplan-Meier analysis, showed an overall survival of 61% at 5 years and 21% at 10 years; survival by type of prosthesis was significantly higher with mechanical prostheses (log-rank p = 0.03). Freedom from cerebrovascular events (thromboembolic/hemorrhagic) at 5 and 10 years was 89% and 62% in the mechanical group and 92% and 77% in the biologic group (p = 0.76). Postoperative NYHA functional class was I or II in 96% of patients. Quality-of-life scores were excellent considering the age of the patients. No differences were found between the two groups. Surgical treatment for symptomatic aortic stenosis in octogenarians has an acceptable operative risk with excellent long-term results and good quality of life. In this cohort, survival rate is slightly but significantly higher with mechanical prostheses.