Abstract

Although mu-opioids such as morphine are undoubtedly effective in the treatment of acute and postoperative pain, kappa-opioids are of interest for the modulation of visceral pain. In the present study, we compared a kappa-opioid agonist (U50488-H; 0.63-40 mg/kg) with a mu-opioid agonist (morphine; 0.63-40 mg/kg) in different pain models (tail withdrawal, writhing, formalin and plantar test) to represent acute, peritoneovisceral and inflammatory pain states in rats. The effects of the respective receptor agonists on gastrointestinal motility, muscle rigidity and abuse liability were also studied in appropriate animal models (charcoal, castor oil, rotarod and drug discrimination learning). Morphine was highly efficacious in all the nociceptive models employed, but also elicited a potent inhibition of gastric motility, caused severe muscle rigidity and locomotor disturbances and displayed a potential for abuse liability at the higher doses tested (> or =10 mg/kg morphine). In contrast, U50488-H was inactive in the tail withdrawal test, but was more effective in visceral and inflammatory pain settings. Although U50488-H did not elicit any gastrointestinal inhibition, a loss of muscle tone following administration of the compound led to detrimental effects on rotarod performance. The findings presented here indicate that kappa-opioids possess antinociceptive efficacy in visceral and inflammatory pain settings, but their administration can lead to a loss of muscle tone. In contrast, mu-opioids are highly active as analgesics against a range of nociceptive stimuli, but also concomitantly elicit strongly adverse effects.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.