Abstract
Recent reports of severe haemolytic reactions upon high dose treatment with new generation intravenous immunoglobulins (IVIGs) prompted us to examine the anti-A and anti-B haemagglutinin content of these therapeutics. We compared four different test methods, namely the indirect and direct haemagglutination test as described in the European Pharmacopoiea (Ph. Eur.) and two commercial gelcard systems with the aim to define the most reliable method for a large-scale comparison of different IVIG products. Absolute titres varied when the same samples were analyzed by the four methods, while the relative ranking of six different IVIG preparations representing different manufacturing classes was identical. New generation IVIGs showed 1–2 titre steps higher anti-A titres than the older products. Haemagglutinin titres of all 48 IVIG batches analyzed were within the current Ph. Eur. specification of ≤1:64 when tested by the official pharmacopoeial method. Based on efficiency, reliability and lower costs, the direct gelcard method could be a valid alternative to the official Ph. Eur. method to serve as a limit test. However, due to the highest intermediate precision, the official Ph. Eur. method seems to be most suitable to compare haemagglutinin titres of different IVIG products.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
