Abstract
The article represents a particular case in the field of the theory of a message encoding and decoding when the message is transmitted from a transmitter to a receiver. In this case human plays a role of the transmitter and receiver. From the positions of the theory of coding and the theory of pattern recognition, considers the phenomenon of anthropological similarity in the anatomical structure of the human sensory-motor system. There is illustration of the importance of the topological similarity of the transmitter and receiver as a source of additional information on the example of an anthropological (species) similarity of the auditory and articulation systems. The results of experiments support the idea the receiver receives additional information or anthropological information about the message, which is decoded not from the message, but from a physical structure of the receiver. Such a transfer is possible with reference to information about human means, articulations, facial expressions and pantomimic poses. It is concluded, in order to convey the knowledge, the physical structure of the information carrier about this knowledge must be the same for the transmitter of the message and the receiver; in other cases, genesis of this additional information a priori impossible.
Highlights
At the intersection of different sciences, frequently were given answers to questions that scientists of one field could not solve, and the search for solutions turned into a way "to pound water in a mortar"
The essence of the hypothesis is in an assumption that the information message contains two components: data and meaning were the second declared as new and not classic
In the context of this hypothesis, the actual question arises: How the meaning is encoded in the brain? To answer this question, the article, from the positions of the theory of coding and the theory of pattern recognition, considers the phenomenon of anthropological similarity in the anatomical structure of the human sensory-motor system
Summary
At the intersection of different sciences, frequently were given answers to questions that scientists of one field could not solve, and the search for solutions turned into a way "to pound water in a mortar". K. Colin [2] shows a critical situation in the further study of "pure" information, a channel for its transmission, calculation of data volumes without calculating the "content" of the information message, and the correctness of the concepts of objective and subjective meanings of the message is questioned. V. Allakhverdov [3] outlines the critical situation in the further study of the psychology of consciousness and states the question of the cause of genesis of consciousness in phylogeny and its role as a cognitive and adaptive tool in human life. The essence of the hypothesis is in an assumption that the information message contains two components (information has two components): data and meaning were the second declared as new and not classic. In the context of this hypothesis, the actual question arises: How the meaning is encoded in the brain? To answer this question, the article, from the positions of the theory of coding and the theory of pattern recognition, considers the phenomenon of anthropological similarity in the anatomical structure of the human sensory-motor system
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
