Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using peroneus longus with lateral extra-articular tenodesis has excellent functional outcomes with a high return to sport rate: A prospective cohort study of 482 patients over 2years.

Is the anterolateral ligament the smoking gun to explain rotational knee laxity or just vaporware?

What's New in Sports Medicine.

What's New in Sports Medicine.

Background: Isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is frequently associated with anterolateral ligament injury (ALL) and results in residual instability at follow-up. It was hypothesized that patients who underwent combined ACL and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) reconstruction would exhibit less residual laxity, better clinical outcomes, and better graft incorporation on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well. Patient and Methods: Sixty-four patients with concomitant ACL and ALL injuries who were operated over a period of 2 years were enrolled between 2016 and 2018. Two groups of patients were evaluated prospectively. Eighteen patients in control Group B underwent anatomical ACL reconstruction alone, and 20 in test Group A underwent ACL reconstruction combined with LET. Exclusions were multiligament injuries, chondral injury, meniscus tear, and ramp lesion. Follow-up by Lysholm and modified Cincinnati knee rating was done and MRI for status of graft at least 1-year postoperative. Results: After excluding dropout or inadequate follow-up, Group A (n = 20) with ACL + LET was compared with Group B (n = 18), with isolated ACL reconstruction, at final median follow-up of 18 months. There were no significant differences between groups regarding gender, age, and duration of injury. Regarding functional outcome scores, patients in the LET group presented better results on both the clinical scoring (P < 0.0001). In addition, patients in the LET group had better graft uptake on MRI and no pivoting at physical examination. Regarding graft failures, the isolated ACL reconstruction group had 5 and the LET group had 1 failure. Conclusion: The combined ACL and LET reconstruction in patients with ACL injury is an effective and safe solution and leads to good functional outcomes with no increase in complications and aids in early return to preinjury activities with a surviving healthy graft.

PurposeThe aim of the study was to directly measure graft forces of an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) and a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) using the modified Lemaire technique in combined anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) deficient and anterolateral rotatory instable knees and to analyse the changes in knee joint motion resulting from combined ACLR + LET.MethodsOn a knee joint test bench, six fresh-frozen cadaveric specimens were tested at 0°, 30°, 60°, and 90° of knee flexion in the following states: 1) intact; 2) with resected ACL; 3) with resected ACL combined with anterolateral rotatory instability; 4) with an isolated ACLR; and 5) with combined ACLR + LET. The specimens were examined under various external loads: 1) unloaded; 2) with an anterior tibial translation force (ATF) of 98 N; 3) with an internal tibial torque (IT) of 5 Nm; and 4) with a combined internal tibial torque of 5 Nm and an anterior tibial translation force of 98 N (IT + ATF). The graft forces of the ACLR and LET were recorded by load cells incorporated into custom devices, which were screwed into the femoral tunnels. Motion of the knee joint was analysed using a 3D camera system.ResultsDuring IT and IT + ATF, the addition of a LET reduced the ACLR graft forces up to 61% between 0° and 60° of flexion (P = 0.028). During IT + ATF, the LET graft forces reached 112 N. ACLR alone did not restore native internal tibial rotation after combined ACL deficiency and anterolateral rotatory instability. Combined ACLR + LET was able to restore native internal tibial rotation values for 0°, 60° and 90° of knee flexion with decreased internal tibial rotation at 30° of flexion.ConclusionThe study demonstrates that the addition of a LET decreases the forces seen by the ACLR graft and reduces residual rotational laxity after isolated ACLR during internal tibial torque loading. Due to load sharing, a LET could support the ACLR graft and perhaps be the reason for reduced repeat rupture rates seen in clinical studies. Care must be taken not to limit the internal tibial rotation when performing a LET.

Background: Young patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) are at a particularly high risk of graft ruptures compared with adults. Recent studies have demonstrated significant reductions in ACL graft rupture rates in high-risk adult populations when a lateral extra-articular procedure is performed, but comparative studies in pediatric and adolescent populations are currently lacking in the literature. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical outcomes of isolated ACLR versus combined ACLR and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) when using the Arnold-Coker modification of the MacIntosh procedure in early adolescent patients. The hypothesis was that combined procedures would be associated with a significantly reduced risk of graft ruptures. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective analysis of consecutive early adolescent patients who underwent ACLR using a hamstring tendon autograft with or without the Arnold-Coker modification of the MacIntosh procedure was conducted. Patients with ≥1 additional risk factors for a graft rupture were offered LET in addition to ACLR (pivot-shift grade 2 or 3, high level of sporting activity defined as Tegner activity score ≥7, participation in pivoting sports, and Segond fractures). Clinical outcomes including graft rupture rates, patient-reported outcome measure scores (Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score and subjective International Knee Documentation Committee), knee stability, return-to-sports rates, reoperation rates, and complications were assessed. Comparisons between variables were assessed with the chi-square or Fisher exact test for categorical variables and the Student or Wilcoxon test for quantitative variables. Multivariate analyses were undertaken to evaluate risk factors for a graft rupture. Results: A total of 111 patients with a mean follow-up of 43.8 ± 17.6 months (range, 24-89 months) were included in the study; 40 patients underwent isolated ACLR, and 71 underwent ACLR + LET. The addition of LET to ACLR was associated with a significantly lower graft rupture rate compared with isolated ACLR (0.0% vs 15.0%, respectively; odds ratio, 15.91 [95% CI, 1.81-139.44]; P = .012). It was also associated with significantly better knee stability (pivot-shift grade 3: 0.0% vs 11.4%, respectively; P = .021) (side-to-side anteroposterior laxity difference >5 mm: 0.0% vs 17.1%, respectively; P = .003) and Tegner activity scores (7 vs 6, respectively; P = .010). There were no significant differences between the groups regarding the Patient Acceptable Symptom State for the patient-reported outcome measures, nor for any of the other outcome measures evaluated, and no differences in the rate of non–graft rupture related reoperations or complications. The ACLR + LET group exceeded the minimal clinically important difference with respect to the Tegner activity scale. Conclusion: In a retrospective comparative cohort study of adolescents, combined ACLR and LET was associated with a significantly lower graft rupture rate and no difference in non–graft rupture related reoperations or complications compared with isolated ACLR.

Evaluation of Return to Military Activities after Combining Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction with Modified Lateral Extra-articular Tenodesis Versus Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Alone in Primary Anterior Cruciate Ligament Tear in Soldiers. A Randomized Comparative Study

Residual rotational instability remains a controversial factor when analysing failure rates of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. Anatomical and biomechanical studies have demonstrated a very important role of anterolateral structures for rotational control. Revision ACL is considered one of the main indications for a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET). Yet, few series evaluating these procedures are published. To perform a systematic review of studies that assessed outcomes in patients treated with revision ACL surgery associated with a lateral extra-articular procedure. Systematic review. A comprehensive literature search was performed in February 2018 using PubMed, Scopus, Web of Search and Cochrane. Inclusion criteria were series of ACL revision reconstructions associated with lateral extra-articular procedures. Clinical outcomes (Lysholm, subjective IKDC, KOOS, Cincinnati and WOMAC), joint stability measures (Lachman test, pivot-shift, arthrometer assessment and navigation assessment), graft type, reported chondral and meniscal injury, radiographic outcomes, complications and failures were recorded. Articles were assessed for level of evidence and methodology using a modification of the ACL Methodology Score (AMS) system. Twelve studies met the inclusion criteria out of the 231 abstracts; 9 retrospective evaluations, two prospective cohorts and one combination of two populations (a retrospective and prospective series). A total of 851 patients evaluated with a mean age of 28.8years (range 16-68years) and a weighted mean follow-up of 4.9years (range 1-10years). The mean time from primary ACL reconstruction to revision was 5.3years (reported in 7 studies, including 710 patients). The Lysholm, IKDC, and KOOS scores indicated favorable results in studies that reported these outcomes. Objective evaluations reported 86% objective A and B IKDC results, 2.6mm mean side-to-side arthrometric difference and 80% negative pivot-shift. About 74% of patients returned to their previous sport (evaluated in six studies). Few studies reported radiological evaluation. Fifty-nine complications (8.0%) and 24 failures (3.6%) were reported. The mean modified ACL Methodology Score was 55.5 (range 32-72). Good mid-term results were obtained for combined revision ACL reconstruction and lateral extra-articular procedures. Despite the fact that in clinical practice LET are a common indication associated with revision ACL, there are no high-level studies supporting this technique. IV.

To determine if anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) with lateral extraarticular tenodesis (LET) is beneficial for restoring knee kinematics with concomitant meniscal pathology causing rotatory knee instability. Twenty patients with an ACL tear were randomized to either isolated ACLR or ACLR with LET. Patients were divided into four groups based on the surgery performed and the presence of meniscal tear (MT): ACLR without MT, ACLR with MT, ACLR with LET without MT, and ACLR with LET with MT. Kinematic data normalized to the contralateral, healthy knee were collected using dynamic biplanar radiography superimposed with high-resolution computed tomography scans of patients' knees during downhill running. Anterior tibial translation (ATT) and tibial rotation (TR) as well as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) were analyzed at 6- and 12-months postoperatively. At 6months, ACLR with LET resulted in significantly decreased ATT at heel strike compared to ACLR (ACLR without MT: 0.3 ± 0.8mm and ACLR with MT: 1.4 ± 3.1mm vs. ACLR with LET without MT: -2.5 ± 3.4mm and ACLR with LET with MT: -1.5 ± 1.2mm ATT, p = 0.02). At 6months, at toe off ACLR with LET better restored ATT to that of the contralateral, healthy knee in patients with meniscal pathology, while in patients without meniscal pathology, ACLR with LET resulted in significantly decreased ATT (1.0 ± 2.6mm ATT vs. -2.6 ± 1.7mm ATT, p = 0.04). There were no significant differences in kinematics or PROMs between groups at 12months. For combined ACL and meniscus injury, ACLR with LET restores native knee kinematics at toe off but excessively decreases ATT at heel strike in the early post-operative period (6months) without altering knee kinematics in the long term. Future large-scale clinical studies are needed to better understand the function of LET and ultimately improve patient outcomes. III.

Background: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions (ACLRs) with graft diameters <8mm have been shown to have higher revision rates. The 5-strand (5S) hamstring autograft configuration is a proposed option to increase graft diameter. Purpose: To investigate the differences in clinical outcomes between 4-strand (4S) and 5S hamstring autografts for ACLR in patients who underwent ACLR alone or concomitantly with a lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedure. Study Design: Cohort study; Level of evidence, 2. Methods: Data from the STABILITY study were analyzed to compare a subgroup of patients undergoing ACLR alone or with a concomitant LET procedure (ACLR + LET) with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm that had either a 4S or 5S hamstring autograft configuration. The primary outcome was clinical failure, a composite of rotatory laxity and/or graft failure. The secondary outcome measures consisted of 2 patient-reported outcome scores (PROs)—namely, the ACL Quality of Life Questionnaire (ACL-QoL) and the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) score at 24 months postoperatively. Results: Of the 618 patients randomized in the STABILITY study, 399 (228 male; 57%) fit the inclusion criteria for this study. Of these, 191 and 208 patients underwent 4S and 5S configurations of hamstring ACLR, respectively, with a minimum graft diameter of 8mm. Both groups had similar characteristics other than differences in anthropometric factors—namely, sex, height, and weight, and Beighton scores. The primary outcomes revealed no difference between the 2 groups in rotatory stability (odds ratio [OR], 1.19; 95% CI, 0.77-1.84; P = .42) or graft failure (OR, 1.13; 95% CI, 0.51-2.50; P = .76). There was no significant difference between the groups in Lachman (P = .46) and pivot-shift (P = .53) test results at 24 months postoperatively. The secondary outcomes revealed no differences in the ACL-QoL (P = .67) and IKDC (P = .83) scores between the 2 subgroups. Conclusion: At the 24-month follow-up, there were no significant differences in clinical failure rates and PROs in an analysis of patients with 4S and 5S hamstring autografts of ≥8mm diameter for ACLR or ACLR + LET. The 5S hamstring graft configuration is a viable option to produce larger-diameter ACL grafts.

Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) is being performed more frequently with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) to decrease graft failure rates. The posterior tibial slope (PTS) affects ACL graft failure rates. The effect of ACLR + LET on tibial motion and graft forces with increasing PTS has not been elucidated. LET would decrease anterior tibial translation (ATT), tibial rotation, and ACL graft force versus ACLR alone with increasing tibial slope throughout knee range of motion. Controlled laboratory study. Twelve fresh-frozen cadaveric knees (mean donor age, 40.5 years; all female) were tested in 4 conditions (intact, ACL cut, ACLR, and ACLR + LET) with varying PTSs (5°, 10°, 15°, and 20°) at 3 flexion angles (0°, 30°, and 60°). Specimens were mounted to a load frame that applied a 500-N axial load with 1 N·m of internal rotation (IR) torque. The amount of tibial translation, IR, and graft force was measured. Increasing PTS revealed a linear and significant increase in graft force at all flexion angles. LET reduced graft force by 8.3% (-5.8 N) compared with ACLR alone at 30° of flexion. At the same position, slope reduction resulted in reduced graft force by 17% to 22% (-12.3 to -15.2 N) per 5° of slope correction, with a 46% (-40.7 N) reduction seen from 20° to 5° of slope correction. For ATT, ACLR returned tibial translation to preinjury levels, as did ACLR + LET at all flexion angles, except full extension, where ACLR + LET reduced ATT by 2.5 mm compared with the intact state (P = .019). Increased PTS was confirmed to increase graft forces linearly. Although ACLR + LET reduced graft force compared with ACLR alone, slope reduction had a larger effect across all testing conditions. No other clinically significant differences were noted between ACLR with versus without LET in regard to graft force, ATT, or IR. Many authors have proposed LET in the setting of ACLR, revision surgery, hyperlaxity, high-grade pivot shift, and elevated PTS, but the indications remain unclear. The biomechanical performance of ACLR + LET at varying PTSs may affect daily practice and provide clarity on these indications.

Background: The biomechanical effect of lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) performed in conjunction with anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR) on load sharing between the ACL graft and the LET and on knee kinematics is not clear. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to quantify the effect of LET on (1) forces carried by both the ACL graft and the LET and (2) tibiofemoral kinematics in response to simulated pivot shift and anterior laxity tests. We hypothesized that LET would decrease forces carried by the ACL graft and anterior tibial translation (ATT) in response to simulated pivoting maneuvers and during simulated tests of anterior laxity. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Seven cadaveric knees (mean age, 39 ± 12 years [range, 28-54 years]; 4 male) were mounted to a robotic manipulator. The robot simulated clinical pivoting maneuvers and tests of anterior laxity: namely, the Lachman and anterior drawer tests. Each knee was assessed in the following states: ACL intact, ACL sectioned, ACL reconstructed (using a bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft), and after performing LET (the modified Lemaire technique after sectioning of the anterolateral ligament and Kaplan fibers). Resultant forces carried by the ACL graft and LET at the peak applied loads were determined via superposition. ATT was determined in response to the applied loads. Results: With the applied pivoting loads, performing LET decreased ACL graft force up to 80% (44 ± 12 N; P < .001) and decreased ATT of the lateral compartment compared with that of the intact knee up to 7.6 ± 2.9 mm (P < .001). The LET carried up to 91% of the force generated in the ACL graft during isolated ACLR (without LET). For simulated tests of anterior laxity, performing LET decreased ACL graft force by 70% (40 ± 20 N; P = .001) for the anterior drawer test with no significant difference detected for the Lachman test. No differences in ATT were deteced between ACLR with LET and the intact knee on both the Lachman and the anterior drawer tests (P = .409). LET reduced ATT compared with isolated ACLR on the simulated anterior drawer test by 2.4 ± 1.8 mm (P = .032) but not on the simulated Lachman test. Conclusion: In a cadaveric model, LET in combination with ACLR transferred loads from the ACL graft to the LET and reduced ATT with applied pivoting loads and during the simulated anterior drawer test. The effect of LET on ACL graft force and ATT was less pronounced on the simulated Lachman test. Clinical Relevance: LET in addition to ACLR may be a suitable option to offload the ACL graft and to reduce ATT in the lateral compartment to magnitudes less than that of the intact knee with clinical pivoting maneuvers. In contrast, LET did not offload the ACL graft or add to the anterior restraint provided by the ACL graft during the Lachman test.

Despite surgical reconstruction, some patients develop persistent residual rotatory laxity following anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction (ACLR). Lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) has been shown to be a successful adjunctive procedure to address anterolateral instability in high-risk patients with ACL tears. It is often performed during ACLR; however, there is growing interest in understanding possible indications for the LET as an isolated procedure. To consolidate the current evidence on isolated LET (iLET) following ACLR, explore its indications, and evaluate outcomes such as laxity, patient-reported outcome (PRO) measures (PROMs), and complication rates. Systematic review; Level of evidence, 4. This systematic review was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines. A comprehensive literature search was performed across Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, EBM Reviews, and Emcare from inception to April 2025. Studies were eligible if they reported outcomes in patients undergoing iLET for residual laxity following ACLR with evidence of an intact ACL graft. Biomechanical, cadaveric, and non-English studies were excluded. Two reviewers independently screened studies, extracted data, and assessed methodological quality. A narrative synthesis was conducted, with descriptive statistics (frequencies, percentages, or weighted means with measures of variability) reported where appropriate. Four studies (N = 69 patients, 70 knees) were included, with a mean ± SD patient age of 25.3 ± 2.9) and follow-up period of 26.3 ± 3.6 months. Patients demonstrated significant reductions in rotatory laxity following iLET, with only 6 patients reporting positive postoperative pivot shift (grade ≥1). Reported PROMs improved across all studies. Complication rates ranged from 15.8% to 36.8% while failure rates ranged from 0% to 10.5%. This review demonstrated that iLET may provide favorable PROs, reduction in laxity, and low failure rates in patients with residual laxity following ACLR. These findings suggest that the use of iLET may be a viable option for residual laxity following ACLR with evidence of an intact ACL graft; however, a limited number of reporting studies and small sample size require these results to be interpreted with caution.

Objectives:Prior literature has shown female soccer athletes are at a higher risk for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) rupture. This risk persists even after primary ACL reconstruction (ACLR), given increased graft failure rates seen in this population. Thus, augmentation strategies such as lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) have gained increasing attention, but there is limited data in high-risk female soccer. The primary outcome of this study was to compare the graft failure rates and patient outcomes of ACLR with LET augmentation compared to isolated ACLR in female soccer players.Methods:A cohort of female soccer athletes who underwent ACLR was retrospectively analyzed. Participants were divided into two groups: those who received ACLR alone (control) and those who received ACLR with LET. Exclusion criteria included patients who were not involved in competitive soccer at the time of surgery or had less than 2-years follow-up. Patient demographics and physical exam findings, including the pivot shift results, were collected. Patient outcomes included graft failure, International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) and Lysholm scores, return to sport rates, and complications. Independent t-tests and chi-squared tests were conducted to compare outcomes between the two groups.Results:A total of 133 female soccer players who underwent ACLR and met inclusion criteria were identified, with 43 patients receiving LET and 90 patients undergoing sole ACLR. The LET cohort had a higher mean Beighton score (3.0 vs. 1.5; P<0.001) and greater proportion of generalized ligamentous laxity (48.8% vs. 18.9%; P<0.001). There were no significant differences between the two cohorts in age, level of competition, type of graft used, or meniscal intervention (P>0.05). Average follow-up was 39.0 and 36.1 months in the LET group and the control group, respectively. Final postoperative IKDC scores were greater in patients who received LET compared to those who did not (91.3 vs. 88.3; P=0.012). Further, there was a lower rate of graft failure, indicated by a confirmed ACL re-tear or a positive post-operative pivot shift, in patients who underwent LET compared to the control group (14% vs. 31.1%; P=0.036). The presence of positive post-operative pivot shift was also lower in the LET group compared to the control (9.3% vs. 27.8%; P=0.023). There were no significant differences in the rates of complications between the two groups (P>0.05), except for 9.3% of the LET patients developing a hematoma at the LET site.Conclusions:LET augmentation in ACLR is associated with a reduced graft failure rate and decreased post-operative rotational instability in female soccer athletes regardless of graft type used. This augmentation strategy may enhance the stability of the knee joint and help improve clinical outcomes, suggesting its potential as a standard adjunctive procedure for female soccer players undergoing primary ACLR.

Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstructions in skeletally immature patients have an increased risk of graft failure and a decreased rate of successful return to sports. Anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions (ACLRs) combined with lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) procedures are reported to limit anterolateral rotary instability of the knee, decreasing tension on the ACL graft. However, the open physes found in pediatric patients present unique challenges for ACLR. This video demonstrates a technique to avoid the femoral physis and necessary precautions for performing an ACLR with LET in a skeletally immature patient. The indications for combined ACLR and LET, as opposed to ACLR alone, mainly center on the risk factors for graft failure. These include the following: posterior tibial slope >12°, revision ACLR, high-grade pivot shift on physical examination, meniscal deficiency, generalized ligamentous hyperlaxity, and-especially pertinent to this procedure-skeletally immature patients. Standard plain radiographs and long-leg alignment films, along with a magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) study, are necessary to assess for malalignment, bone age, and concomitant meniscal and chondral pathology. This technique describes the senior author's preferred technique for pediatric ACLR with LET. The senior author's preferred order of operations includes performing the autologous hamstring graft harvest and LET before performing the diagnostic arthroscopy. This is followed by the intra-articular work including the ACLR. It is also the senior author's preference to perform physeal-sparing femoral tunnels, using fluoroscopy for tunnel placement. Getgood et al reported that an ACLR with an LET in young patients with a high risk of graft failure had a significant reduction in graft rupture compared to an ACLR alone. Furthermore, Noyes et al reported a significantly lower rate of graft failure and a higher rate of return to sports in those who received LET in addition to ACLR compared with those who received ACLR alone. An ACLR combined with an LET has been reported to reduce graft failure rates and improve clinical outcomes in high-risk patients. An ACLR with LET may also be considered in skeletally immature patients with appropriate indications and extra precautions to avoid growth arrest or deformity. The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.