Abstract

We present data showing that an anomalous maximum in the electrical-resistivity-versus-temperature [$\ensuremath{\rho}(T)$] curve, similar to that in ${\mathrm{Pr}}_{c}{\mathrm{La}}_{1\ensuremath{-}c}{\mathrm{Sn}}_{3}$, is present for all $c$ in ${\mathrm{Tb}}_{c}{\mathrm{Y}}_{1\ensuremath{-}c}\mathrm{As}$, but is absent for all $c$ in ${\mathrm{Tb}}_{c}{\mathrm{Y}}_{1\ensuremath{-}c}\mathrm{P}$ and ${\mathrm{Tb}}_{c}{\mathrm{Y}}_{1\ensuremath{-}c}\mathrm{Sb}$. An interesting question is why there is no maximum in $\ensuremath{\rho}(T)$ for both ${\mathrm{Tb}}_{c}{\mathrm{Y}}_{1\ensuremath{-}c}\mathrm{P}$ and ${\mathrm{Tb}}_{c}{\mathrm{Y}}_{1\ensuremath{-}c}\mathrm{Sb}$ for any $c$, while there is a maximum for all $c$ in ${\mathrm{Tb}}_{c}{\mathrm{Y}}_{1\ensuremath{-}c}\mathrm{As}$. This question is particularly striking since the crystal-field splitting and N\'eel temperature of TbP and TbSb bracket that of TbAs.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.